Investment - Articles - Advice firms avoiding UK regulation a threat to investors


Foreign financial advice firms, which circumvent UK regulation using passporting rules, are acting with impunity, warns AES International. Under the European Economic Area’s (EEA) Freedom of Services rules, financial firms which are regulated in one member state are permitted to sell financial products in other member states within the EEA.

     
  1.   FCA has no direct powers to act against firms passporting in
  2.  
  3.   Consumers have no right of recourse
 This means, a company regulated in any of the other 30 countries within the EEA can sell products in the UK, without being directly regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). 
  
 As a consequence, the products these companies sell are not subject to the same tight rules around consumer protection as directly regulated firms. Despite this, the firm will appear on the FCA register and will often claim to be regulated by the FCA to clients as they will have been issued with an FCA number.
  
 This is one area that AES International believes should be made clearer for consumers.
 If a consumer were to use one of these companies, they will have no recourse to the Ombudsman and so could be left out of pocket if something were to go wrong.
  
 Furthermore, if the FCA has cause for concern about a company acting under these passporting rules, the only action it can take is to complain to the company’s home regulator.
  
 Sam Instone, chief executive of AES International, said:
 “This is a very real problem for British investors. By bypassing the strict rules and regulations we have in the UK, these companies are putting investors at risk.
  
 “Not only are these consumers at risk, they are often getting completely ripped off, as these firms use charging structures which have been outlawed in the UK – such as hidden commissions.
  
 “The consumers most at risk are those who travel frequently or those who spend large portions of their time living elsewhere, such as those in retirement.
  
 “These companies often build relationships with people while they are abroad and make much of the fact that they also have a UK office, giving the false impression that they are UK regulated and lulling people into a false sense of security.”
 Competitive advantage
  
 In addition, companies which are able to circumvent UK regulation are able to operate much more economically as they will not suffer the same overheads which come with complying with UK regulations.
  
 “The financial services profession is, quite rightly, subject to stringent consumer protection rules which help to ensure consumers are treated fairly and that we act in their best interests – but this all comes at a cost," added Instone.
  
 “By circumventing UK rules, firms can cut their overheads significantly, giving them a competitive advantage over companies which would arguably serve their clients much better.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Schroders receive FM mandate from RNIB Retirements Scheme
Schroders Solutions today announces it has been awarded a £170 million Fiduciary Management (FM) mandate by the Royal National Institute of Blind Peop
Comments on the unexpected fall in inflation
Standard Life and My Pension expert comment as inflation unexpectedly falls to 2.5%
PIC complete full buyin for Holophane Retirement Scheme
Pension Insurance Corporation plc (“PIC”), a specialist insurer of defined benefit pension schemes, has concluded a £24 million full buy-in of the Hol

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.