Pensions - Articles - 'Scary meaningless' public sector pensions numbers


 Reacting to new Treasury estimates for the costs of future public sector pensions liabilities published today (Wednesday), TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said:

 'These figures are a nakedly political attempt by the government to strengthen its hand in the negotiations on public sector pensions, after its continued failure to sustain the argument that they are unaffordable.

 'These numbers may well be scarily big, but they are close to meaningless. Both the National Audit Office (NAO) and John Hutton's review say that this is not an appropriate measure of the affordability of public sector pensions. Small variations in assumptions can produce huge differences in this figure, even though the payments remain the same.

 'Projecting the government's future liabilities on any area of spending and presenting them as a bill that has to be paid all at once will always produce numbers too big for most people to grasp.

 'The truth is that even before the government slashed the value of pensions by linking them to the lower Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation measure, public sector pensions were the one part of age-related expenditure not set to increase in the years ahead.

 'NAO figures and the Hutton report show the cost of public sector pensions as a share of GDP falling in years ahead.

 'This is an ideological government that wants to reduce the size of the state and cut public services to fund tax cuts for its rich friends. It is not surprising therefore that the government will use any opportunity to scare people about the public finances - but scare tactics do not make for sensible politics.

 'No wonder the Office for Budget Responsibility has warned of the limitations of this approach to accounting in their report today.'

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Mansion House reforms to kick start pensions adequacy review
The Financial Times reported overnight that the Chancellor will use her Mansion House speech to kickstart the pensions adequacy review via a commissio
DB funding improves H1 2025 but clouds loom on the horizon
Fully-hedged scheme sees funding position increase by 1.0 percentage point to 70.3% at the end of June. 50% hedged scheme sees smaller gain of 0.4 per
Member experience key factor in insurer selection
Poll results from a recent LCP webinar on the pension risk transfer (PRT) market show that member experience is rising up the agenda for schemes when

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.