General Insurance Article - Advisers split on ‘robo-advice’ will it become mainstream


New research from Aegon UK reveals advisers are split as to whether robo-advice will become mainstream in future with just under half (48%) believing it will be widely adopted.

  

 • Half of advisers (48%) believe digital financial advice will become mainstream in the future
 • However, just 24% of UK consumers currently trust digital financial advice
 • 73% of advisers remain unsure of what truly constitutes robo-advice

 This research into the future of the advice market comes at a time when the government and FCA are consulting on how to extend advice and other forms of support to a broader audience as part of the Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR).

 At present, the majority (63%) of advisers say they would trust the outcome of an online questionnaire that examined answers to questions regarding attitude to investment risk and investment goals and then used an algorithm to recommend investment options. However this confidence is not yet mirrored by UK consumers.

 Just 24% of UK consumers currently say they trust financial advice from digital sources. This figure falls as people get closer to retirement age and are more likely to seek advice in person. Just 15% of those aged 55 and over said they would trust advice based on an online questionnaire.

 Advisers report that robo-advice is poorly defined with nearly three quarters (73%) unsure of what truly constitutes robo-advice.

 Given both adviser and consumer uncertainty, there’s clearly a challenge to be clear with customers what robo and digital advice mean and where they can play a part in meeting customer needs.

 Steven Cameron, Regulatory Strategy Director at Aegon commented: “Technology has positively disrupted many business models but when it comes to financial services, there are still a number of challenges to overcome. People need reassurance when it comes to major financial decisions and most will welcome having the option of some human support such as a call at the very least to ensure they’ve understood their options. On this basis it’s not surprising many people said they were sceptical about digital advice, and may not be attracted to an online only model.

 “Current terminology doesn’t help matters. Robo-advice may have an offputting dehumanized ring to it, whereas digital apps are a welcome part of today’s world. Customers may be more open if we talk in ‘money app’ terms. Financial advisers say they are unclear what constitutes robo-advice, and as part of the Financial Advice Market Review, we’d like to see the regulator set out very clear definitions in customer language of what constitutes advice as well as guidance and where digital support sits within this.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

IPT receipts for 2024 to 2025 hits over GB7bn in January
According to this morning’s HMRC data, Insurance Premium Tax (“IPT”) receipts stood at £853 million in January 2025, bringing the 10-month total for t
Unlocking the potential of IFRS17 insights and opportunities
As mentioned in part one of this blog series, IFRS 17 has reshaped financial reporting for insurance contracts since its implementation on 1 January 2
Lack of expertise main barrier to AI adoption in insurance
A lack of expertise within insurance companies is the biggest challenge to implementing artificial intelligence (AI) technology. As AI has the potenti

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.