Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Bigger and better pension schemes through incremental change
While dashboards may encourage individuals to consolidate their pension pots, consolidation of pension schemes and default funds are high on the Gover
How board level AI governance is changing
Technology and AI governance remains a top concern for corporate directors and executives in 2025 relative to safeguarding data, managing new technolo
The impact of the US trade war
A dramatic shift in US trade policy has sparked renewed uncertainty for investors. This note explores the scale of the new tariffs, market reaction, a

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.