Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Devolution and LGR governance implications for the LGPS
2025 has got off to a hectic start for the LGPS with the ‘Fit for the Future’ consultation and planning for the year(s) ahead. That’s going to continu
Four key issues HMRC must fix on IHT in pension proposals
I believe there are four key issues that HMRC need to address in their proposals on how to apply inheritance tax (IHT) to pension benefits. The change
Driving the Sustainability Challenge in Claims
Join us for this MGAA Market Briefing delivered by Sedgwick. The session is delivered by Ian Gibb, National Technical Manager who explores how climat

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.