Pensions - Articles - Aon urge DC schemes to act now to get better member outcomes


The Aon DC Survey 2015, published today, revealed that 57% of its respondents said that achieving better member outcomes is the top priority in their scheme’s business plan. However, the same research showed a stark disconnect between this ambition and demonstrable results, with many schemes without the knowledge and management reporting needed to facilitate an improvement in outcomes.

 Sophia Singleton, partner and head of DC Consulting at Aon Hewitt, said:
  
 • Only 16% of the respondents receive regular management information on outcomes, while 90% receive information on investment performance.
 • 68% of those surveyed had no knowledge of the expected replacement ratio for their members – a key summary measure of retirement income, which looks at a member's retirement income as a proportion of pre-retirement earnings
 
 “DC schemes are emerging from a busy 18 months during which many have implemented major initiatives such as auto-enrolment and pensions freedom. For many schemes, ensuring they are able to meet the demands of these major initiatives has absorbed their full resource and attention.
  
 “Now is the time to re-set the DC agenda. If schemes are serious about the ambition to achieve better member outcomes, then they need to start setting clear targets and putting plans in place to achieve them. They must also set and measure themselves against clear KPIs to ensure that their intentions become reality.”
  
 Top scheme priorities
 The Aon DC Survey 2015 includes 330 responses, representing a total of 297 UK DC pension schemes with nearly 1.2 million members and over £33 billion of assets. The top three objectives identified by schemes in their business plans were:
  
 • Better member outcomes (57%)
 • Specific communication goals (46%)
 • Evidence of increased member engagement (45%)
  
 Sophia Singleton said:
 "Having these as key targets suggests positive moves towards what the Pensions Regulator is looking for, but to deliver real outcomes for members these theoretical objectives need to be backed by practical steps. These include making engagement genuinely engaging, finding the right investment structure, providing members access to the new flexibilities, and - importantly - having a focus on governance.”
  
 Managing member expectations
 Aon also highlighted the disconnect between members’ expectations and what a scheme can actually deliver.
  
 For example, very few trust-based schemes intend offering access to a full drawdown solution, although some of them are looking at alternative solutions to offer drawdown to their members. Less than half (43%) of the respondents had either a preferred drawdown solution in place or were currently developing one. This is in contrast with the results of the Aon and Cass Business School 2014 members survey which highlighted that 50% of members are likely to need an income drawdown solution.
  
 Sophia Singleton continued:
 “DC pensions are inherently flexible, so important decisions and responsibilities are left in the hands of the member. While this allows for greater choice, it puts pressure on sponsors and pension trustees to make sure that all processes are well communicated and that members receive the right education and information to make the right choices. If expectations are out of step with what is realistically possible, schemes need to address this urgently to avoid future problems.”
  
 Other key findings from the survey include:
 • 6% of the respondents do not know what their objectives are or have no business plan for their DC scheme
 • Communication – 77% of the respondents think that it is the employer’s role to communicate with, educate and support members. But, nearly half of the schemes (45%) are relying on the pension provider to undertake this important role.
 • Options at retirement - 39% of schemes are still targeting an annuity as the default investment option at retirement
 • Over 40% of respondents did not know about the use of strategies such as white-labelled funds, or target date funds.
 • Self-select investment choices - GPPs behave very differently to master trusts and trust-based schemes. 72% of GPPs offer more than 20 funds, typically all the funds available on the platform. By contrast, half of trust based schemes offer six to ten funds.
 • Management time - One in five trustees spend less than two days a year on DC.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.