Pensions - Articles - Buck Consultants comment on Work & Pensions Committee report


“With some notable exceptions, pension policy and regulation has been bedevilled by a lack of consistency”, said Kevin LeGrand, Head of Pensions Policy at Buck Consultants at Xerox.

 “The recommendations made today by the Work and Pensions Committee in its report, in respect of the underlying processes, are therefore sensible and overdue. In particular, the dual recommendations of a single regulator for pensions and the creation of a new independent pensions commission, which should together address a perennial curse for the provision of income in retirement. 
  
 “Not for a generation has there been such a critical need for workplace pensions issues to be consistently and thoughtfully addressed.
  
 “There are crucial pensions-related decisions looming for consideration in the next parliament, including a review of tax relief that appears to be on the agenda of each of the main parties, the need to build on the successes of the early stages of automatic enrolment to increase the amounts of money being saved, and the critical early years implementation of the new retirement freedoms.
  
 “During the current parliament the policy side has been more consistent, thanks to there being a single Pensions Minister throughout. As the general election approaches, the oft-claimed broad political consensus on policy seems to be disintegrating, leading to concerns that the past five years has merely been a blip in the long-term practice of subjecting pensions to party political doctrine. If the predictions of a hung parliament are borne out, the prospects for stability in pensions policy appear even more remote.
  
 “On the regulatory point, it makes little sense to have the role split between several bodies. We understand the logic that since 1988 has divided responsibility between products that are sold to individual consumers and those that are provided as part of the workplace pension structure. However, the subsequent breaking down of those distinctions that has occurred, and the further changes coming under the Freedom and Choice agenda in April, render them increasingly arbitrary and at odds with the broad approach now needed to retirement funding.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comments on the PPF levy announcement
WTW and Broadstone comment on the PPF levy announcement
Schroders pension to harness DB surplus for DC contributions
Schroders announces its commitment to running-on its Defined Benefit (DB) pension and leveraging a portion of the surplus to partially fund its Define
Proposed PPF Levy change welcomed
The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has repeatedly called for a legislative change that would enable the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to reduc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.