Pensions - Articles - Buck Consultants’ 5 pension priorities for next Government


Kevin LeGrand, Head of Pensions Policy, Buck Consultants at Xerox says ‘We are at a watershed with workplace pension provision. The next round of policies could either build a strong focused pension system providing decent levels of benefit, or bury them in a general savings system where short-term decisions prevail.

 ‘The below is a collection of policies forming one vision of a way forward to addressing a number of the outstanding issues. It is by no means the only solution and is offered as a straw man to provide a basis for debate but simple and effective provision for financial security in retirement will be essential. We need a holistic and co-ordinated approach to reforming the structure and detail of the UK’s pensions system, and, for all our sakes, we need to get this right.
 
 ‘Despite huge changes over the past five years, there are still significant issues to be addressed. This includes some new ones that have arisen from recent reforms, demonstrating the need for an holistic and co-ordinated approach to reforming the structure and detail of the UK’s pensions system.’
 Buck’s five pension policy priorities for the next government:
 
 • Create an independent pensions authority. The exact format, role and responsibilities to be determined in a forum early in the new parliament. Will drive development of a new framework within which necessary changes can be made and maintain long-term stability. Key attributes must include simplicity and intuitiveness, particularly for the member.
 • Drive an increase in the size of pension accounts. The aggregate annual contribution under automatic enrolment should be set to target the minimum living costs level, assuming membership over a full career. In addition, the default should be for the auto-escalation of contributions through a career.
 • Review the pensions tax relief regime, to give it proper focus and make it more robust for the future. Tax relief is a constant target of politicians looking to save money. The negativity this creates undermines pensions. The new authority should address this as a priority. One key change should be the abolition of the lifetime allowance, which discourages higher contributions.
 • Encourage the involvement of employers in the provision of retirement income. Development of policies should always include consideration of the impact upon employers and seek to make that positive. Key elements would include financial encouragement through the tax system, and simplicity in administrative and regulatory requirements.
 • Enable greater provision for the self-employed. This group has poor pension coverage. Their numbers have increased significantly since the economic downturn. They should be brought into the automatic enrolment and auto-escalation of contributions systems.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.