Pensions - Articles - Call for hold on unsuitable DB transfer redress consultation


Aegon calls for FCA to put on hold its consultation on redress for unsuitable Defined Benefit transfers until suitability is redefined around modern client objectives

 DB transfer advice must start with client’s primary objective
 Post freedoms, many customers are seeking flexibility, not to ‘beat’ scheme pension level
 Appropriate redress methodology needs to reflect client objectives

 Aegon has called for the FCA to put on hold its current guidance consultation GC17/1 which is looking at changes to the way firms calculate redress for unsuitable defined benefit (DB) transfers. The redress consultation was launched in March, but the FCA has since revealed plans to consult more broadly on DB transfers and today Aegon argues that this broader consultation should take priority with a focus on updating ‘suitability’ to reflect the pension freedoms available within Defined Contribution (DC) pensions.

 Steven Cameron, Pensions Director at Aegon says: “The FCA is consulting on updating redress calculations where advice on DB transfers is found to be unsuitable. But the far bigger question is, in a post pension freedoms world, what is suitable advice and what’s not. The surge in demand for DB transfer advice means advisers need urgent regulatory clarity from the FCA to allow them to support clients achieve their objectives in this complex area.

 “People used to transfer out of DB schemes in the hope of securing a higher retirement income through an annuity but now, their objective is often to access the Government’s pension freedoms which have proved popular with their DC pensioner peers.

 “There’s growing acceptance that if the primary objective is flexibility, advice shouldn’t be based solely on the likelihood the transfer value will secure an annuity at scheme pension age above the DB benefit given up. Advisers quite rightly need to explore wider objectives and the additional value to the individual offered by pension freedoms, such as choosing when to start taking an income, how to shape income year on year and leaving funds to loved ones.

 “Before updating redress calculations, the FCA needs to clarify when DB transfer advice will be considered unsuitable. If the individual does want to take a guaranteed income from scheme pension age, then redress based on the traditional TVAS approach may be reasonable. But if the individual has made clear they are looking for flexibility, basing redress on annuity replacement costs just doesn’t seem right.

 “The way forward may be two completely different redress calculations depending on the primary objective. We believe the FCA is putting the ‘cart before the horse’ and should put the current guidance consultation on hold until after its forthcoming wider consultation on DB transfer advice.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.