Pensions - Articles - Comment on Hughes v Royal London Group


Commenting on the judgement in the case Hughes v. Royal London Group a Royal London spokesman said:

 “Pensions Liberation and pensions fraud raise serious concerns for providers like Royal London. We therefore take transfer requests very seriously and look out for the warning signs highlighted by the Regulators and relevant guidance. In spite of what we might find, if a customer has a statutory right to a transfer then there is very little we can do if the customer wants to proceed. The transfer must be allowed.

 This judgement provides greater clarity on the circumstances which determine when that statutory right exists and we will obviously comply with the Court Order relating to Ms Hughes’ transfer.
 
 Royal London’s concern has only ever been to comply with the Regulatory guidance and to assist our policyholders to avoid circumstances where they risk losing all or part of their pension benefits.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

2025 is a key year for pensions to consider their endgame
Aon has said that 2025 is a key year for UK pension schemes and has formed the UK Endgame Strategy team to help schemes with the decision-making proce
How pension tweak could save employers thousands
National Living Wage increased this month from £11.44 to £12.21 per hour. Employer National Insurance (NI) has also risen and the threshold at which e
2024 pension contributions surge but gender gap widens
New analysis from PensionBee highlights a sharp increase in pension contributions in 2024, despite ongoing pressures on household budgets.

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.