Pensions - Articles - Comment on lower life expectancy projections - JLT


The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries have revised the CMI Mortality Projections Model used by the vast majority of UK pension schemes when making assumptions about the life expectancy of their members. The 2015 version of the model, released today, predicts that life expectancies have fallen compared to 2014. A male currently age 65 is now predicted to live for 24 years and 5 months on average. This is 4 months less than the 2014 model predicted. As a result, those who use this model will see their liability come down.

 Hugh Nolan, Chief Actuary at JLT Employee Benefits, comments:
 “The latest actuarial model, released today, predicts that life expectancies have fallen compared to 2014. A male currently age 65 is now predicted to live for 24 years and 5 months on average, 4 months less than the 2014 model predicted.

 “This reduces the liabilities of UK private sector pension schemes by some £15bn. While this is only 1% of the total liabilities held, it will reduce the deficit in a scheme that is 90% funded by 10% of that deficit, which can be extremely helpful for individual schemes struggling to reach full funding.

 "Similarly public sector pension liabilities (including State pensions) could reduce by around £70bn. This will be a very welcome boost to the Treasury!

 “This is a significant blip in life expectancy trends and is unprecedented in recent times. Trustees and employers need to consider the new information carefully and decide whether to adopt the new projections when updating their figures. The latest mortality statistics may just be a random variation or they could indicate a genuine slowing of the rapid improvements we’ve seen recently. We may need to wait for another major change in lifestyles or significant medical advances before longevity accelerates back to the same level as over the last few years.”

 Francis Fernandes, Actuary &Senior Adviser at Lincoln Pensions, comments:
 "The new tables serve as a timely reminder to trustees and employers of DB pension schemes that any mortality tables are simply a guide to the future. It's probably better to be pragmatic and reflect any step changes in the tables - good or bad depending on one's perspective - over a period of years. This will give sufficient time to see if the revised tables are borne out in practice, noting the sponsor covenant will be there to support the impact of adverse experience."
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.