Pensions - Articles - Comments on pensions tax relief administration consultation


Aegon and the PLSA comment on the pensions tax relief administration consultation

 Kate Smith, head of pensions at Aegon: “We’re delighted that the government is finally looking to address one of the greatest injustices in the pensions tax relief system. Low earners, mainly women, who are saving in pension schemes which use net pay schemes to administer pension tax relief are not receiving the 20% tax relief on their pension contributions to which they are entitled.

 “Had they been saving in a scheme which used ‘relief at source’ to administer pension tax relief they would have received this government top-up and had more in their take-home pay. This is a growing problem as more non-taxpayers are being auto enrolled into a workplace pensions scheme and not always benefiting from the top-up. It’s important that this group is treated equally and fairly, regardless of how tax relief is administered. Having this, could make the difference for people to decide to keep on saving, or to opt out of their workplace pension scheme.

 “Although the consultation has been a long-time coming any solutions needs to be simple for savers to understand and easy and inexpensive for employers, providers and the government to administer. It may take a while to square this circle.”

 Lizzy Holliday, Head of DC, Master Trusts & Lifetime Savings, PLSA, said: The publication today by the Government of a call for evidence on the net pay/relief at source issue shows long overdue progress towards fixing the tax anomaly that is leaving 1.75 million of the lowest paid pension savers in ‘net pay arrangements’ worse off. On the minimum auto-enrolment contributions, those affected are losing up to a total of £63 a year each, and in many schemes it can be at least double this figure. Of the affected population, over 75% are female.”

 “The PLSA has long advocated for the ‘P800’ solution using Real Time Information (RTI) data – as the best option to addresses the issue and we will continue to engage with Government regarding the barriers they have posed – action is needed on this matter.” 
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comments on the PPF levy announcement
WTW and Broadstone comment on the PPF levy announcement
Schroders pension to harness DB surplus for DC contributions
Schroders announces its commitment to running-on its Defined Benefit (DB) pension and leveraging a portion of the surplus to partially fund its Define
Proposed PPF Levy change welcomed
The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has repeatedly called for a legislative change that would enable the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to reduc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.