Pensions - Articles - Companies face shortages with further auto-enrolment delays


 • Around two-thirds of companies are only just starting to consider impact of requirements
 • 15% either don’t know what the requirements are or haven’t given them any thought yet
 • Few companies plan to lower contribution levels to minimum requirement
 
 Around two-thirds of companies are only just starting to prepare for auto-enrolment, a delay likely to cause a serious squeeze on the provider market in 2013, according to Mercer. Amongst 200 respondents to a recent survey* 15% are either unsure of what the requirements mean for them or have not given them any thought yet. Twenty-two percent are some way into planning already, whereas only 1% said they’re already implementing and a further 1% are almost ready to deliver subject to final regulations.
 
 Rachel Brougham, Principal and Head of Mercer’s auto-enrollment initiative, said: “It seems that lots of people have returned from their summer breaks and have acknowledged that they need to start thinking about auto-enrolment. For a successful and compliant introduction of the new requirements by 2013 they need to be getting into the detail of the planning now. Delay too long and they could well find provider capacity exhausted, leaving them facing the prospect and consequences of non-compliance or trying to engage with NEST at the last minute.”
 
 Ms Brougham added: “Provider capacity aside, employers need to consider the significant impact that auto-enrolment will have on HR and payroll systems and processes too.”
 
 Only 2% of survey respondents said they plan to level down benefits as a result of auto-enrolment -ie reduce contributions to the minimum requirement for all employees. Sixteen percent think that they will maintain current levels for existing members and plan to introduce minimum contributions for new hires and auto-enrolled employees. However, the majority of the respondents (54%), are planning either to maintain existing scales for everyone or allow employees a "voluntary upgrade" to a better scale subject to eligibility requirements.
 
 “It’s very encouraging that, despite the current economic environment, we’re not seeing a wholesale rush to level down although it is inevitable that some employers will have to go down this route.” said Ms Brougham. “Although that’s not to say that all current contribution levels are high enough to provide members with a decent income in retirement. Most pension schemes still have some way to go to reach that goal.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Gender income gap narrows but still around GBP730 per year
focuses on the narrowing of the income gap between male and female pensioners, which has fallen from over £1,450 per year to around £730 per year (aft
Pension participation booms but self employed left behind
Pension scheme participation among working-age people has increased from 37% in 2013-14, to 55% in 2023-24. Among employees it has grown from 53% to 7
10 years of Pension Freedoms a Lamborghini or a safety net
1 in 12 (8%) over-55s cashed in one or more of their pensions. Only 4 in 10 looked at the tax implications of taking out a taxable lump sum. 4 in 10 o

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.