Pensions - Articles - Danger of Government agenda disrupting current pension plans


In their response to the DWP consultation ‘Pensions Investment Review: Unlocking the UK pensions market for growth’ the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA) says that, whilst the Association supports the drive for scale and investment in productive assets, the proposals outlined in the consultation could have negative consequences for savers and employer support for pensions at a time when savings adequacy is long-term societal challenge.

 To mitigate and address the adverse consequences of some of the proposals, whilst supporting the push for growth.
  
 The key points in the ACA response are that:
 Instead of focussing on a minimum number of default funds, it would be better and safer to focus on the scale of the underlying funds,
 Continue to permit differential pricing on the grounds it is essential to encouraging investment in productive assets and so as not to adversely impacting employer support for pensions saving,
 Prioritising and continuing with existing measures (VFM, small pots etc) and avoid trying to squeeze massive transition programmes into too shorter timeframes. The Australian model has developed over decades, and any transition needs to take account of the UK’s long pensions experience and the quite difference history that other countries will have had,

 In addition, the ACA response calls for greater consistency in the framework and requirements for employers on ensuring Value for Members and is supportive of making it easier to transfer and consolidate contract arrangements subject to appropriate safeguards.

 ACA Chair, Stewart Hastie thanked Tess Page and the ACA DC Committee for preparing its response and added: “We also urge Government to look to the DB side of UK pension provision in furthering its objectives for growth by bringing forward legislation to better enable the transfer of DB surplus into DC arrangements. This could not only fund DC benefits for current and future workers and provide some much-needed positive incentives to UK employers but also provide greater near term support for increasing the scale of some specific DC funds. We continue to be disappointed that legislative changes in this area seem to have been put on the back-burner when they could offer an extremely valuable and quicker boost to both investment and member outcomes.”

 ACA Pensions Investment review Consultation Response in Full

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.