Pensions - Articles - Default drawdown will not fix supersonic pension reforms


Jon Greer, Head of Retirement policy at Old Mutual Wealth comments on the government’s response to the Work and Pensions Committee recommendations for pension freedoms

 Jon says: “Pension freedoms were first introduced in what seemed a supersonic speed of policy making, leaving the industry and public in a state of shock. That is why, three years after the reforms were introduced, policymakers are still asking questions.

 “Is it reasonable to default people automatically into a vehicle, when people reach pension age with different aims and pension provision? This is the question of default drawdown in a nutshell and we’re pleased the government has recognised the risk of such a move. Auto-enrolment has proved that inertia is a powerful policy tool, but there is danger in that power. Drawdown needs to be designed to fit with an individual’s specific circumstances so sleepwalking into a pre-selected solution will not necessarily provide good outcomes. Such a solution requires at least some level of engagement.

 “Initiatives like the mid-life MOT and encouraging the take up of advice through the use of technology are steps in the right direction. Innovation should continue to be focused on boosting engagement. The upcoming findings from the FCA Retirement Outcomes Review may shed further light on the direction of travel.”

 “Nest’s over 6.4 million members need to have the same opportunities for a prosperous retirement as the rest of the public. These members typically have smaller pots and so their choices are limited in the current market.

 “Nest should be allowed to develop innovative products to fit their members if the market does not provide suitable options for their members, who typically will be people with smaller pension savings. In 2015 Nest insight put forward a “retirement blueprint” outlining three building blocks for retirement income: an income drawdown fund; a cash lump sum fund and a later life protected income fund.

 “This has been put on hold at the current time , but that should not preclude it being developed in the future. However, we urge the move into such a decumulation strategy to be an active choice rather than a default which kicks in automatically at a specified date. Spending in retirement is highly dependent on personal circumstances and requires at least some level of engagement.

 “However, nothing in life is free and NEST has a large outstanding loan, totalling £539m at the end of March last year. This debt is expected to peak to £1.22bn in 2026. If NEST is to develop further decumulation options it needs time and money. The government will need to consider if they should extend the loan so NEST can confidently spend time developing further options and whether that represents value for money since it will be Nest members who will ultimately pay back the principle loan and interest.” 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.