Investment - Articles - EIOPA advises to set up a new asset class under Solvency II


Robust criteria have been put forward to identify eligible infrastructure projects; Risk charges for investing in qualifying infrastructure projects have been carefully calibrated to the respective risks leading to a different treatment; To benefit from a different treatment insurers will need to conduct adequate due diligence as part of an effective risk management of this complex and heterogeneous asset class.

 The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published today its Advice to the European Commission on the identification and calibration of infrastructure investments risk categories. EIOPA has suggested a more granular approach by advising to create a separate asset class under Solvency II standard formula for investments in infrastructure projects. This new asset class seeks to capture high quality infrastructure, whilst recognising the complex and heterogeneous nature of such investments.

 The proposed approach meaningfully reduces risk charges for qualifying infrastructure project investments in equity and debt. At the same time EIOPA proposes robust risk management requirements including active monitoring of exposures to infrastructure projects as well as sound stress testing of their cash flows.

 Gabriel Bernardino, Chairman of EIOPA, said: “EIOPA has made remarkable progress in proposing a new asset class and a prudentially sound regulatory treatment within a Page 2 of 3 very short timeframe. Investments in infrastructure could be very important for the insurance business because, due to their long-term nature, they may be a good fit to match long-term liabilities while also increasing portfolio diversification. However, infrastructure projects can be very complex and require specific risk management expertise. It is very important that risks of infrastructure investments are properly managed and monitored over time. Under such conditions, I believe that the proposed calibrations reflect the risk profile of high-quality infrastructure projects”.

 According to the Advice, qualifying infrastructure investments will need to satisfy conditions relating to the predictability of the cash flows to investors, the robustness of the contractual framework, and their ability to withstand relevant stress scenarios. Regarding calibrations, EIOPA recommends that the spread risk charge within the Solvency II standard formula is amended for qualifying infrastructure debt investments according to a modified credit risk approach (reduction of around 30% in the risk charge for BBB rated qualifying infrastructure). Risk charges for infrastructure equity investments are proposed to be in a range between 30% and 39%. In terms of risk management, insurers should in particular conduct adequate due diligence prior to the investment; establish written procedures to monitor the performance of their exposures and regularly perform stress tests on the cash flows and collateral values supporting the infrastructure project. Click here to access the Advice

  

 To download the document please click below

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Inheritance Tax raises almost GBP6 billion in 8 months
December’s update from HMRC shows that Inheritance Tax (IHT) receipts reached £5.7 billion through the first two-thirds of this financial year (April
PIC completes first Mosaic buyin with GCB Pension Fund
Pension Insurance Corporation plc (“PIC”) has concluded its first full scheme buy-in within Mosaic, PIC’s streamlined service for pension schemes with
Airways Pension Scheme complete longevity hedge with MetLife
The Trustees of the Airways Pension Scheme (“the Scheme”), Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc., (“MetLife”) and Z

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.