Pensions - Articles - FCA's 'Meeting investors expectations' raises more questions


In its own brief analysis on its website of the FCA thematic review ‘Meeting investors’ expectations’, Fowler Drew points to the irony of the regulator reminding active fund managers of the need to inform investors’ expectations about future relative return and risk.

 FCA report on how managers describe their fund's investment approach raises bigger questions over active management

 At some purely superficial level, Fowler Drew agrees, there must be a best efforts attempt to describe the management approach in ways that meet the Conduct of Business requirements of being fair, complete and not misleading. But the FCA ought to know (as it certainly once did) that there is far more randomness and much less control in active security selection than a statement of investment policy relative to a benchmark implies, so the more a manager attempts to comply with the spirit of COBS the greater the risk of feeding misleading expectations. Maybe that’s why the FCA requires managers to warn that past performance is not indicative of future performance, or is that limited to absolute rather than relative performance?

 Fowler Drew point to another logical fallacy here: assuming that retail customers’ expectations about outcomes depend on what each individual fund says, when most investors (whether advised or self-directed) choose to hold several as a means of diversifying their active-manager risk. Even if better disclosure meant we ended up with far fewer ‘closet indexers’, the problem of paying active fees for passive results would persist because diversifying active manager risk, which would then be even more compelling, tends to result in portfolio returns on average and over time close to a passive fund but with higher charges.

 The FCA review will doubtless be seized on by critics of closet indexers but, given the data evidence for all funds, that is a minor and unsurprising finding, even in a small sample like this. In his analysis Stuart Fowler argues the review ‘does support investors who opt for a passive approach but mainly by what it unintentionally suggests about the fundamental nature of active management risk and reward’.

 Read Fowler Drew’s comments here.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.