Pensions - Articles - FTSE350 Pension deficit soars to record £119bn after Brexit


Mercer’s Pensions Risk Survey data shows that the accounting deficit of defined benefit (DB) pension schemes for the UK’s 350 largest listed companies increased from £98 billion on 31 May 2016 to £119 billion at the end of June in the aftermath of the Brexit vote.

     
  1.   Liabilities hit a record high of £813bn, £52bn up from May
  2.  
  3.   Accounting deficits increase by £21bn to £119bn
 At 30 June 2016, asset values were £694 billion (representing a rise of £31 billion compared to the corresponding figure of £663 billion at 31 May 2016), and liability values were £813 billion, representing an increase of £52 billion compared to the corresponding figure of £761 billion at the end of May.
  
 Pension liabilities are at the highest level since Mercer’s monitoring began. Increases in asset values, driven by the devaluation of sterling and the possibility of a cut in UK bank base rates, have offset this increase in liabilities. However, the immediate response of the markets to Brexit was clearly bad news for pension scheme deficits.
  
 “The fall in corporate bond yields meant that liability values increased by over 5% during just one month, corresponding to a 20% increase in deficit values,” said Ali Tayyebi, Senior Partner in Mercer’s Retirement business. “Government bond yields fell even more than corporate bond yields which meant that liabilities on the funding basis, which pension scheme trustees typically use for setting cash contribution requirements, increased by over 8%.”
  
 Mr Tayyebi added, “The level of market volatility in the last week of June is just an early skirmish in the fight to understand the longer term outlook for the UK’s economy and markets. More than ever, the risks and associated opportunities which this creates and the appropriate speed of response will be very specific to the circumstances of individual pension schemes, highlighting the value of frequent monitoring of funding levels and, for some clients, delegated investment management.”
  
 Le Roy van Zyl, Senior Consultant in Mercer’s Financial Strategy Group, said, “Brexit may be positive for some schemes, for example, where the business outlook of the sponsor has improved significantly due to better export prospects. For others, their ability to continue to underwrite pension deficits and risk taking may have deteriorated significantly. Clearly, trustees and sponsors should be assessing the new state of affairs to determine if new priorities are needed or any action taken. Uncertainty may be here for some time.”
  
 Mercer’s data relates to about 50% of all UK pension scheme liabilities and analyses pension deficits calculated using the approach companies have to adopt for their corporate accounts. The data underlying the survey is refreshed as companies report their year-end accounts. Other measures are also relevant for trustees and employers considering their risk exposure. But data published by the Pensions Regulator and elsewhere tells a similar story. 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.