Pensions - Articles - Gender Equalisation of Pensions to hit FTSE100 profits


Looming court decision on gender equalisation of pension schemes could hit FTSE 100 profits by up to £15bn. New half-year update to LCP’s Accounting for Pensions (AfP) report provides updated snapshot of FTSE 100 pension scheme financial health, and gauges sentiment of corporate directors on the Government’s DB white paper and other market developments.

 In the latest half-year update to its landmark Accounting for Pensions (AfP) report, pensions advisory firm LCP has estimated that an imminent court ruling on gender equalisation for pension schemes – potentially requiring the removal of inequalities that arise in benefits between men and women because of unequal Guaranteed Minimium Pensions (GMPs) – could result in a P&L hit to FTSE 100 companies to the tune of £15 billion, this could happen as soon as 2018.
  
 As part of the latest report, respondents to LCP’s survey of corporate decision-makers also noted concerns about potential criminal sanctions to punish directors and limits on dividends paid to shareholders. More specifically:
  
 The biggest concern for corporate directors when it came to pension schemes was to reduce volatility – often caused by inconsistency between measures of funding, accounting and investment.
  
 Four-fifths of respondents – many of whom represent schemes in excess of £1 billion – believed that companies should address deficit while profits are high..
  
 Over half said the biggest concern with having an accounting surplus while still paying contributions was communicating the apparent contradiction between accounting surplus and funding deficit to the relevant stakeholders.
  
 A fifth of those surveyed stated that commercial consolidator vehicles, which offer companies the opportunity to fully settle their defined benefit pension liabilities, are firmly on their agenda.
  
 Over 50% are concerned that expected proposals around funding requirements will raise the funding bar to levels which harm corporate sponsors.
  
 In terms of financial health, the latest figures analysed in the report show half of FTSE 100 companies with an IAS19 pension surplus, totalling £50 billion, while the other half have deficits totalling £20 billion. Those with an IAS19 accounting surplus are still planning to pay deficit contributions of around £25 billion. The overall IAS19 surplus of FTSE 100 companies is around £30 billion at the end of September, up from the 2017 year-end total of £4 billion.
 
 Phil Cuddeford, LCP partner and lead author of the report, commented: “The forthcoming GMP equalisation ruling, could lead to a one-off hit to profits this year of around £15 billion for FTSE 100 companies as well as a larger overall deficit and higher contributions. Although clarity around this issue will be welcome, the broader impact on FTSE 100 companies and many others could be stark.”
  
 “With many important changes in the pensions landscape coming through, including beefing up the powers of the Pensions Regulator, directors are rightly focussing their attention on suitable governance. Corporate decision-makers are also concerned that new funding rules could be harmful to companies.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.