Pensions - Articles - Governance risks need greater attention in LGPS


Aon has said that proposals to accelerate investment pooling in the UK Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities’ consultation ‘LGPS England and Wales: Next steps on investment’, come with governance risks and the potential for conflicts of interest.

 Alison Murray, partner and head of Public Sector UK, Wealth Solutions, Aon, said: “Governance matters must not be overlooked in responses to this consultation. Moves to accelerate pooling come with governance risks, and there are many practical challenges, such as managing conflicts of interest relating to local investments and implementing effective knowledge and skills requirements.

 “The proposal to improve transparency and reporting, including a requirement for a single standard set of data on investments across annual reports and LGPS statistics is welcome, but there is no proposal to assess nor report on any governance improvements. Given some strong statements in the consultation on how accelerated pooling will improve governance, it is important the governance impacts are measured and monitored.”

 Mary Lambe, senior consultant and head of Public Sector Governance, Wealth Solutions, Aon, commented: “The proposal to allow pools to assist LGPS funds by ensuring decisions to invest in local areas can be taken at pool level, which avoids perceived or potential conflicts of interest, still need fleshing out. More details of how, in practice, decisions taken by individuals representing the LGPS funds at pool level avoid conflict are needed to understand this proposal further.”

 The proposals also state that “pools should be actively advising funds regarding investment decisions, including investment strategies”.

 Mary Lambe continued: “We are concerned that this practice could bring conflicts of interest if a pool is advising constituent funds on investment strategies. But there are other considerations, including whether pools would be able to meet the requirements of the National Framework for provision of strategic investment advice.

 “There needs to be clarity on why pools should provide this advice and what benefits it would bring to the LGPS”.

 Alison Murray concluded: “It has been a long wait for this consultation and whilst it is very positive to finally have some clarity over the direction of travel, in its enthusiasm to extol the benefits of pooling, we believe key governance aspects are being overlooked. It is vital that this is addressed before the proposals progress further.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.