Sarah comments: “This new draft legislation is a positive step but needs to happen quickly. Uncertainty in the cost of claims can lead to yo-yoing in pricing and insurers must not forget that a move even to the top end of the range indicated by the government still means that claims costs have significantly increased since 2016. We welcome plans to regularly review the rate with the support of an expert panel and hope that this would eliminate sudden and unexpected jumps in claims costs.
“The change to the Ogden rate in February was reckless to the extreme. To impose the change without any form of consultation or apparent understanding of the impact it would have on some of the most vulnerable drivers on the road, defied belief. The youngest drivers - who have relatively more large claims and higher premiums – were hit hardest by this change and this is of course in addition to recent hikes in insurance premium tax. What we need is regular reviews and consultation prior to changes such as this not swingeing decisions imposed with no notice.
“We know from ABI analysis of motor insurance premiums, prior to the impact of the Ogden rate change, the only age group not to see increases in their average premiums were the under 21s because the increasing use of telematics is keeping premiums under control.
The benefits of telematics to young drivers are undeniable – lower insurance costs, safer driving and the mobility they need to live their lives. But in just a few months, the Ogden rate change added huge cost to the sector and was predicted to push premiums up by at least 7% by next year – in the young driver market we estimated it could be as much as 15% and the sector warned of premiums reaching all-time highs.
“This ‘about face’ is therefore a good step forward but sadly it is one small victory in a host of battles the sector faces to provide customers with competitive premiums.”
|
