Pensions - Articles - Huge wave of pension transfer requests from DB schemes


The latest results published by the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA) in the second interim report of this year’s ACA Pension Trends Survey point to a huge bow wave of pension transfer requests from defined benefit schemes which, the ACA says, is placing enormous pressures on scheme administration. Alongside other freedom and choice costs, transfer value activity is adding between 10-20% to scheme administration costs over previous years. The ACA survey also found some six out of ten employers reporting that members are having difficulties in finding advisers prepared to advise on these transfers which may, in part, be contributing to only around 1 in 4 requests being completed.

 The ACA survey, which was conducted over the summer and received responses from 466 employers, found:

 Amongst those with defined benefit schemes (39% of sample)

 47% say the incidence of transfer requests exceeds 5% of scheme members, with a third of these employers reporting requests exceeding 10% of scheme members
 However, completed transfers are at a lower level. Just 16% report completed requests exceeding 5% of scheme members
 61% of employers say members are having difficulty in finding advisers prepared to advise on pension transfers

  

 

 Over the last two years, it has been reported that over £50 billion has been withdrawn from defined benefit schemes, with average transfers out of DB schemes now exceeding £250,000. The ACA’s findings underscore mounting concerns that high transfer values (due to low interest rates) are stimulating member interest in cashing in DB pensions. The flames are being further fuelled by concerns over scheme deficits. Recent publicity suggested three million of the UK’s defined benefit scheme members may only have a 50:50 chance of receiving full benefits. 

 ACA Chairman, Bob Scott, commented: There are concerns about both the availability and appropriateness of the regulated advice available to DB scheme members. Other research suggests that only around half of those who took advice to transfer were properly advised. Of the other half, one third of recommendations were unsuitable and the remainder were unclear. 

 “This is disappointing but isn’t surprising. DB pensions are complex and varied and their value is not well understood. Comparing a DB pension to uncertain post-transfer investment returns and income choices is fiendishly complex.

 “Our survey results confirm the ongoing shortage of IFAs prepared to provide guidance services in this complex area. However, many schemes are additionally noting to our members that where IFAs are providing advice, the questions they pose during the transfer process are varied and time consuming. The quantum of enquiries and differences in approaches is posing difficulties for administrators and pushing up administration costs. Standardisation in the questions asked would seem to be a sensible step and this may be an area where the FCA could act swiftly to help all concerned.”

 Further Interim Reports on the survey’s findings are due to be published and a final report in November.
   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.