Pensions - Articles - Industry remains sceptical of pensions consolidation


Research from the Pensions Management Institute (PMI) has revealed that two thirds of respondents think that DB consolidation could succeed. A survey conducted by the institute, which questioned industry professionals on their views, also revealed a degree of mistrust of consolidation in both the Defined Benefit (DB) and Defined Contribution (DC) spheres.

 Participants were not fully confident in the value of DB consolidation, as 33% of respondents said they do not think it is a good idea. Concerns were related to the need for careful regulation and proper management, with some respondents questioning whether commercial operators would really be able to provide consolidation propositions to smaller schemes who would benefit the most. 

 There has been much speculation around whether single DC trusts will transition into DC Master Trusts, but research showed that an overwhelming majority (77%) of participants think that less than half of these schemes will make the transition. The industry outlook for Collective Defined Contribution (CDC) was fairly pessimistic, as two-thirds (67%) of participants said they do not think it will succeed. Respondents expressed concerns that the moment for CDC to flourish has passed, as individual DC pots are now well-established.

 A significant body of industry professionals appear troubled by the direction of travel of UK pension policy. One third (30%) of participants said they were unsatisfied with recent developments, expressing concerns around a lack of joined up thinking between the Treasury, DWP and the Regulators.

 When questioned on the Government consultation process, over one in ten (12%) respondents said that the practice does not result in effect policy implementation, with some participants even arguing that the Government often proceeds with policy in the face of significant objections.

 Lesley Carline, President, Pensions Management Institute, commented: “Whilst our respondents felt DB consolidators will succeed and have a role to play within the UK pensions market, there is concern over governance and security, and a note that they will not help out smaller distressed DB schemes that need a solution to their woes. That said they are not marketing themselves as saviours but as an alternative to traditional options.

 “Our members also remain sceptical towards CDC, which could have proven useful when employers first began to close their final salary schemes. However, there is a risk that the appropriate time for its introduction has now passed as DC pots have become commonplace.

 “With the proliferation of consultations and the promised pensions bill on the horizon, we all hope that the outcomes will reflect the input from the industry and produce effective policy addressing some of the fears noted in the survey response.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.