Pensions - Articles - IORP II trialogues offer opportunity to safeguard members


The upcoming trialogue discussions on the revised directive on Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (IORP II) between the European institutions provide an important opportunity to ensure appropriate safeguards for IORPs’ members and beneficiaries, according to Insurance Europe, the European insurance and reinsurance federation.

 IORPs play an important role in providing retirement income to workers. Therefore, it is important that IORP II offers a high standard of protection for IORPs’ members and beneficiaries. Currently, the regulatory treatment of IORPs differs significantly across Europe. This means that the resilience of IORPs in different member states also varies. Because both the current directive (IORP I) and the proposal for IORP II do not address these differences, it is important that IORPs’ cross-border activities are fully-funded at all times.

 Nicolas Jeanmart, head of personal insurance, general insurance & macroeconomics at Insurance Europe, said: “This will guarantee a high level of protection for members and beneficiaries, even when a foreign IORP — which is subject to the prudential rules of another member state — manages their pension promise. It will also prevent the transfer of risks to other countries and limit the risk of regulatory arbitrage between the different prudential rules applicable to IORPs.”

 A longer transitional period should also be granted to markets where the option set out in article 4 has been implemented. This provision allows insurers to manage occupational pension schemes according to IORP rules, provided that they ring-fence their business. Moving to a different framework (Solvency II) is a lengthy, complicated and costly process that needs to be amortised over a long period, i.e. well beyond 2022, as currently envisaged.

 Jeanmart added: “Another important point is the information given to prospective and existing members and beneficiaries. Insurance Europe believes that people should be fully aware of the risks they bear, including in the pre-enrolment phase. In particular, all the conditions linked to pension promises (e.g. soft or hard guarantees) should be clearly disclosed, given that IORPs might be allowed to reduce pension benefits in particular cases.”

 It is important for information requirements to be principle-based, so that they are able to respect national rules and traditions. In many member states, pension information is already provided through a variety of means, in line with local practices and the design of national pension systems.

 The trialogues begin on February 29.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.