Pensions - Articles - Is the Chancellor set to utilise pension complexity?


 Ahead of an expected announcement in the Budget of a £5.5 billion "windfall" from pension reform, Michael Johnson, pensions and savings analyst at the Centre for Policy Studies comments:

 "The end of public sector employer NICs rebates (roughly £3.4 billion p.a.) as a result of the Single Tier pension reform represents no net cost (or saving) to the taxpayer: it credits the Exchequer, and debits Departments. The 1.4% increase in public sector employees' NICs (roughly £1.4 billion per year) will provide a net gain to the Exchequer (along with a smaller gain from contracted-out private sector employers and employees, totalling some £0.8 billion per annum).The question then is whether HMT chooses to:

 return the public sector employers' lost NICs rebates to the Departments; or
 "bank" the saving, either to cut public spending or to spend on new initiatives, such as the Dilnot proposals.

 The latter seems likely, as reported this evening.
 
 The unions have left the Chancellor with little choice, because part of the price of the public service pensions deal was a 25 year pledge, from the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, of "no further change" to public service pensions. Consequently, public sector workers will retain the in-built enhancement to their occupational pensions, that compensates them for having been contracted out of the second state pension, as well as being eligible for additional accruals to the single-tier state pension. This "double benefit" will cost the Chancellor billions of pounds per year. Conversely, such a "win-win" is denied to contracted-out private sector workers; they are likely to see their occupational pension benefits reduced by their employers, to recoup the latter's loss of their NIC rebates."

 
 Tim Knox, Director of the Centre for Policy Studies comments:
 
 "The cumulative effect of the Coalition pension reforms will be to break the ring-fence of major spending departments such as the NHS. Given our economic predicament, this break in the ring-fence is a necessity. But the root cause is the failure to reform public sector pensions which UK households will soon be paying an average of £1,600 a year to support. Yes, the Chancellor will tomorrow be able to claim that the end of public sector pension rebates will mean that he has £5.5 billion for new initiatives such as his proposals for long-term care; and to manage the deficit figures. But it is to be greatly hoped that he is clear about what is really happening." 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Two thirds of Administrators involved in pension strategy
With forthcoming legislation, from Inheritance Tax on unused pension pots to the 2025 Pension Schemes Bill set to have considerable implications for p
With profits funds beat high street savings rates last year
With-profits funds delivered an average return of 5.6% in 2024, down from 8.3% in 2023 but beating high street fixed saving rates The biggest differen
Master Trusts show climate change policy advocacy progress
As COP30 focuses global attention on the policies and intervention needed to deliver a net-zero future, LCP has analysed sixteen of the UK’s largest m

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.