Pensions - Articles - Is the Chancellor set to utilise pension complexity?


 Ahead of an expected announcement in the Budget of a £5.5 billion "windfall" from pension reform, Michael Johnson, pensions and savings analyst at the Centre for Policy Studies comments:

 "The end of public sector employer NICs rebates (roughly £3.4 billion p.a.) as a result of the Single Tier pension reform represents no net cost (or saving) to the taxpayer: it credits the Exchequer, and debits Departments. The 1.4% increase in public sector employees' NICs (roughly £1.4 billion per year) will provide a net gain to the Exchequer (along with a smaller gain from contracted-out private sector employers and employees, totalling some £0.8 billion per annum).The question then is whether HMT chooses to:

 return the public sector employers' lost NICs rebates to the Departments; or
 "bank" the saving, either to cut public spending or to spend on new initiatives, such as the Dilnot proposals.

 The latter seems likely, as reported this evening.
 
 The unions have left the Chancellor with little choice, because part of the price of the public service pensions deal was a 25 year pledge, from the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, of "no further change" to public service pensions. Consequently, public sector workers will retain the in-built enhancement to their occupational pensions, that compensates them for having been contracted out of the second state pension, as well as being eligible for additional accruals to the single-tier state pension. This "double benefit" will cost the Chancellor billions of pounds per year. Conversely, such a "win-win" is denied to contracted-out private sector workers; they are likely to see their occupational pension benefits reduced by their employers, to recoup the latter's loss of their NIC rebates."

 
 Tim Knox, Director of the Centre for Policy Studies comments:
 
 "The cumulative effect of the Coalition pension reforms will be to break the ring-fence of major spending departments such as the NHS. Given our economic predicament, this break in the ring-fence is a necessity. But the root cause is the failure to reform public sector pensions which UK households will soon be paying an average of £1,600 a year to support. Yes, the Chancellor will tomorrow be able to claim that the end of public sector pension rebates will mean that he has £5.5 billion for new initiatives such as his proposals for long-term care; and to manage the deficit figures. But it is to be greatly hoped that he is clear about what is really happening." 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Mansion House reforms to kick start pensions adequacy review
The Financial Times reported overnight that the Chancellor will use her Mansion House speech to kickstart the pensions adequacy review via a commissio
DB funding improves H1 2025 but clouds loom on the horizon
Fully-hedged scheme sees funding position increase by 1.0 percentage point to 70.3% at the end of June. 50% hedged scheme sees smaller gain of 0.4 per
Member experience key factor in insurer selection
Poll results from a recent LCP webinar on the pension risk transfer (PRT) market show that member experience is rising up the agenda for schemes when

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.