Pensions - Articles - James Atherton Comments on PPF 2012/13 Draft


 "Hidden in the small print of the PPF's consultation is a proposal that could have significant implications for sponsors of pension schemes. The PPF is proposing changes to the way that guarantees to schemes, which many organisations use to significantly reduce their PPF levy payment, will be allowed for. In future, the scheme will have to certify that a company providing such guarantees would be able to afford to pay the full amount should it be called upon.
 This proposal seems certain to put additional costs on employers. Professional advice may well be required in order to provide the necessary certification. If certification is not, or cannot be given, the levy could materially increase. Our view is that organisations that have provided such guarantees in the past should review their arrangements at an early stage to ensure they will continue to be effective in reducing the levy."

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comments on the PPF levy announcement
WTW and Broadstone comment on the PPF levy announcement
Schroders pension to harness DB surplus for DC contributions
Schroders announces its commitment to running-on its Defined Benefit (DB) pension and leveraging a portion of the surplus to partially fund its Define
Proposed PPF Levy change welcomed
The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has repeatedly called for a legislative change that would enable the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to reduc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.