Pensions - Articles - Labour needs to do more to protect pensioners


James McLeod, head of pensions at AES International, suggests if an elected Labour government wants to continue to reform the pensions market, it may need to take on more responsibility for guiding and protecting consumers.

 McLeod said: “Labour’s sentiment on ensuring pension savers get good value is of course well placed. However, it is much easier said than done. There is unprecedented pressure on pension providers and the IFA community to support the latest pension changes and, while the industry is doing as much as it can to support those reaching retirement, perhaps the government needs to take on even more responsibility for ensuring people are not ripped off by pension scammers.

 “There is plenty of guidance available already to people – either paid for or free, yet it is often not taken, and the current government has already taken some action. But perhaps the next government may want to consider more direct ways it can educate those reaching retirement about their options or clamping down harder on those who abuse the system.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

2025 is a key year for pensions to consider their endgame
Aon has said that 2025 is a key year for UK pension schemes and has formed the UK Endgame Strategy team to help schemes with the decision-making proce
How pension tweak could save employers thousands
National Living Wage increased this month from £11.44 to £12.21 per hour. Employer National Insurance (NI) has also risen and the threshold at which e
2024 pension contributions surge but gender gap widens
New analysis from PensionBee highlights a sharp increase in pension contributions in 2024, despite ongoing pressures on household budgets.

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.