Pensions - Articles - Liquidity and risk concerns may slow down investment aims


Aon has said that responses to polling on a recent webinar about the Mansion House reforms indicated that perceptions of liquidity requirements and risk remain as barriers to increased investment in illiquid assets by UK pension schemes.

 The 330 attendees of the webinar were asked what has previously stopped them from investing more in illiquid assets. In response, 41 per cent cited liquidity, 27 per cent mentioned risk, and 11 per cent the availability of appropriate products. Issues around complexity and governance were mentioned by the remainder.

 Shelley Fryer, associate partner at Aon, said: “In his Mansion House speech, the Chancellor of the Exchequer outlined his aims for more UK pension schemes to invest in illiquid investments supporting the UK economy - both to benefit member outcomes and the economy overall. However, responses to our polling showed that implementing these reforms may be challenging in the shorter term.

 “This may be a reflection of the maturing of defined benefit (DB) pension schemes and lower cash contributions from sponsors, meaning that liquidity of invested assets is more important and the ability to recover from downside shocks is reduced. It may also reflect a desire to hold more liquid assets in order to respond to market volatility or to transact with an insurer.”

 Shelley Fryer continued: “Additionally, the effects of last year's gilts crisis have left some schemes already overweight in illiquid assets. They are currently more likely to be inclined to reduce their holdings than increase them.”

 While the situation for defined contribution (DC) schemes differs, the future response is just as complex.

 Chris Inman, partner at Aon, said: “DC schemes have the challenge of daily pricing – which affects their ability to have high allocations to illiquid assets. Additionally, the tendency of DC decision-makers to focus on cost over outcomes can count against illiquid investment - although the consultation on value for money in DC is designed to counter this.

 “Indeed, as smaller DC schemes look to prepare for the consolidation proposed as part of the Mansion House reforms, liquidity concerns may be heightened in the short term. But we believe that bigger schemes will be well-placed to maximise the potential of illiquids in the longer term, given both their scale and membership profiles.”

 Shelley Fryer added: “It's clear that for both DB and DC schemes, illiquid investments in which the Chancellor is hoping to see increased investment are going to need to stand on their own merits within the global marketplace and to suit the needs of schemes and their members as they navigate new forms of volatility.

 “Ultimately, appropriate funds need to be made available – especially for DC schemes - if the goal of increased investment is to be achieved.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.