Pensions - Articles - Mercer backs lifting of NEST restrictions


 • Annual pension contribution limits will drive smaller employers away from NEST
 • Pension transfer restrictions inconsistent with pot follows member system
 
 Removing the current annual contribution and pension transfer restrictions on the national pensions scheme, National Employment Savings Trust (NEST), is critical to the accessibility of the scheme for UK employers and employees, said Mercer, in its response to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) consultation on NEST constraints.

 The DWP consultation examines the impact of the annual contribution limit and the restrictions on transfers imposed on NEST. The rules were introduced to protect consumer interests by focusing NEST on its target market. Under the current rules, NEST has an annual contribution limit of £4,400 for each member in the tax year 2012/2013 and this is adjusted annually in line with changes in average earnings. Most pension transfers are also banned, whether the pension is being transferred into or out of NEST.

 Dina McDonald, Principal at Mercer commented, “Mercer supports the removal of NEST restrictions before the end of the staging period in February 2018. Although the restrictions do not currently appear to be driving the selection of the auto-enrolment scheme for most employers staging over the next 12 months, this is because larger employers are more likely to accept the need for more than one pensions vehicle, each targeting the needs of specific segments of their workforce.

 Fixed maximum annual contributions will become more of an issue as growing numbers of smaller employers are required to enroll their workforce into pension schemes. These employers, who are NEST’s main target market, will often have one or two key workers whose earnings are such that they could be impacted by the annual contribution maximum. This may have the knock-on effect of driving smaller employers and their employees away from NEST and towards commercial master trusts which do not have these restrictions.”

 Mrs McDonald added, “Similarly, the continuing imposition of the pension transfer ban is likely to be viewed negatively by employees in NEST, when compared with colleagues enrolled with other pensions scheme providers. These employees will not be able to consolidate their pension savings in NEST, and those close to retirement may not secure the best possible income. It is also impossible to envisage a streamlined pot-follows-member process if one of the key pension providers is unable to participate.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

4 ways completing a tax return can help boost your pension
Missing the Self-Assessment deadline not only risks a penalty for late filing but could cost individuals hundreds, if not thousands of pounds in uncla
DWP holds AE thresholds with GBP90bn of pensions expected
The DWP has issued its review of the Automatic Enrolment Earnings Trigger and Qualifying Earnings Band for 2025/26, retaining all three thresholds at
Response to Triple Lock means testing comments
Aegon has called for ‘a future focused debate on a sustainable state pension’ following comments on the Triple Lock by Conservative leader Kemi Badeno

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.