Pensions - Articles - More covenant information needed before agreeing to deferral


Almost half (47%) of pension trustees and professionals said that a lack of clear information on the strength of their sponsor covenant was the major barrier to agreeing to a contribution deferral in the current COVID-19 climate, according to a survey by Hymans Robertson. Around a fifth (21%) also cited scheme funding as a major barrier to a deferral request.

 The consultancy estimates that around 14% of schemes have either received or are expecting to receive a contribution deferral request. The findings also showed that deferral requests for longer than three months and raising more debt at the same time as deferring contributions were less immediate issues for trustees. 

 Alistair Russell-Smith, Head of Corporate DB comments on the DB pensions environment today: “The speed and scale of the COVID-19 crisis has had a severe impact on the economy and businesses around the globe. Understandably, this means some employers are looking for short term relief from pension contributions. Regulatory guidance implies it should be relatively straightforward to agree deferrals for up to 3 months, even when covenant impact or visibility is not always clear or complete. However, our survey suggests that a lot of pension scheme trustees do want clear information on the covenant impact before agreeing to a deferral request.

 “I expect that trustees then consider other issues, such as deferrals for longer than 3 months or raising more debt, as important points that need to be considered, but secondary to the fundamental point of ‘do we have enough visibility on the corporate impact to agree to a deferral in the first place?’

 “Ultimately, it will be in the long-term interests of all parties to reach an agreement and for trustees to support their sponsor through a difficult, but hopefully temporary situation. The impact of the virus, and the measures to contain it, will be different for every business.   I’m sure, however, that both trustees and TPR will be keen to ensure these flexibilities are still used in the right way.”
   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comments on the PPF levy announcement
WTW and Broadstone comment on the PPF levy announcement
Schroders pension to harness DB surplus for DC contributions
Schroders announces its commitment to running-on its Defined Benefit (DB) pension and leveraging a portion of the surplus to partially fund its Define
Proposed PPF Levy change welcomed
The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has repeatedly called for a legislative change that would enable the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to reduc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.