General Insurance Article - More dynamic and simpler economic capital models needed


 The insurance industry needs more dynamic and not more complex economic capital models if it’s going to avoid suffering again some of the problems that were exposed during the financial crisis four years ago. This was the view expressed by Markus Stricker, director of the Willis Economic Capital Forum (WECF), the latest initiative from the academic and analysis arm of Willis Group Holdings.

 “I think everyone in the industry would be interested in reducing the complexity of models, making things more transparent and thus easier to understand,” said Stricker. “We ought to have learnt in the years since the financial crisis that our economic capital models need to be more dynamic and more insightful.”

 Instead, Stricker thinks that Solvency II has become more complicated and its benefits will not be fully realised.
 The WECF was announced in July last year and is based at Georgia State University. It aims to support the insurance industry’s development and use of economic capital models and is part of the Willis Research Network.

 Strickler added “Looking at economic capital in a very static manner is not all that helpful, in particular if many of the parameters only have a marginal impact on the economic capital requirements. We need to develop simpler, more dynamic models that give us more insight.”

 Speaking about the WECF, Stricker said it will seek to advance applied research on the topic of internal economic capital models in a number of ways. One of the biggest challenges that insurers and regulators face, which the Forum will seek to overcome, is to validate their models, he said.

 “At the moment a standardised process does not exist for validating economic capital models. This creates a number of issues such as their limitations and evolution over the years is usually not well documented, the comparability of their results between years and between companies is difficult to assess and last but not least the validation process is often inefficient.

 “These issues could be addressed by a widely recognised and structured validation process. This would introduce more transparency and efficiency for all stakeholders: insurance companies, regulators and brokers.

 “We can learn a lot from looking at other industries,” he continued. “Aeroplane manufacturers, for example, run standardised stress tests so they know how much pressure they can put on a wing before it breaks off. Meanwhile pharmaceutical companies have a rigorous, structured process to get a medication validated.

 “I think we need a similar set of standard procedures to validate the methods that financial companies use to calculate solvency related key figures. The WECF can make a big difference in this area.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

LA wildfires expose insurance crisis
Following the recent devastation caused by wildfires in Los Angeles, which have resulted in billions of dollars in damage; Ben Carey-Evans, Senior Ins
LIIBA publish their 2025 agenda
A groundbreaking project to quantify the monetary value of London’s brokers to the global economy is at the centre of LIIBA’s newly published agenda f
Car insurance records biggest annual fall in over 10 years
Comprehensive car insurance premiums have decreased by 16% (£161) during the last 12 months. UK motorists are now paying £834 on average, according to

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.