Pensions - Articles - Parties have failed to grasp issues for younger generations


Commentary from Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at Quilter:

 “In previous decades, young people could look forward to enjoying a more prosperous future than their parents, as they had benefitted from greater fortune than the generation before. It became a truism that each generation would be better off than the last. But for a variety of reasons that steady growth in incomes has been replaced by stagnation, with those born in more recent decades often less well off than their parents were at the same age.

 “However those concerned that the intergenerational social contract is under threat will not be reassured by the party manifestos which, as this analysis shows, continue to play to power of the grey vote at the neglect of the youth one.

 “Given the rises in life expectancy, the cost of the state pension is only going to go one way. Therefore Labour’s plan to scrap rises to the state pension age will increase the burden on the deceasing number of working age people. Similarly, significant provisions would be needed to be set aside to fund promises made by both Labour and the Liberal Democrats to work with the Waspi women in order to compensate them for their issues, challenging the policy objective for responding to increased life expectancy.

 “With all the main parties pledging to retain the triple lock could prove unsustainable in the long run and the bill will be picked up by the upcoming generations. Given the costs associated, perhaps it is unsurprising to see intergenerational experts worried about the impact on future generations.

 “Away from pension policy, Labour has also pledged to scrap the inheritance tax residence nil rate band. While this is a complex allowance, scrapping it altogether will stem the flow of wealth between the generations and fail to address the increasing issue of intergenerational fairness.

 “What is clear from the main parties is that they haven’t necessarily grasped the problem facing younger generations when it comes to pensions and tax. There will come a time when innovation is needed in this space and the sooner that begins the better the outcome.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comments on TPR guidance on actuarial s37 confirmations
Barnett Waddingham and ARC Pensions Law comment on the The Pensions Regulator publishing its guidance on Section 37 issues arising from Virgin Media L
Pension transfer lament and FCA plans risk making it worse
Almost one-in-three (28%) people who have attempted to switch pension providers in the last three years have found the process “difficult”. Worryingly
TPR guidance on retrospective actuarial s37 confirmations
Regulations made under section 37 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 restricted certain alterations to the rules of an occupational pension scheme contra

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.