Pensions - Articles - Pension schemes should not rest easy after Scot vote


 The Scottish people yesterday voted to remain part of the UK. A vote for independence would have been expected to lead to greater costs and complexity for pension schemes in Scotland and the rest of the UK.
 
 Commenting on the outcome of the referendum, Mike Kennedy, Partner at Barnett Waddingham said:

 
 “The prospect of schemes operating across the Scottish border being forced to meet stricter funding requirements has now fallen away. However, pension schemes and their sponsoring employers should not rest easy. The Scottish Parliament was promised additional powers from Westminster in the run-up to the vote and it is likely that they will seek to use them. If differences arise in legislation and taxation between Scotland and the rest of the UK, this will lead to complications for administering schemes with members in both regions, and therefore increased costs.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comments on the PPF levy announcement
WTW and Broadstone comment on the PPF levy announcement
Schroders pension to harness DB surplus for DC contributions
Schroders announces its commitment to running-on its Defined Benefit (DB) pension and leveraging a portion of the surplus to partially fund its Define
Proposed PPF Levy change welcomed
The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has repeatedly called for a legislative change that would enable the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to reduc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.