Pensions - Articles - Pension schemes ‘stressed’ by new PPF test, says Mercer


 Extra governance by pension scheme trustees on their choice of company guarantee is required to avoid being caught out by the Pensions Protection Fund’s (PPF) stringent ‘stressed and smoothed’ test, says Mercer. The consultancy is warning that failure to anticipate and plan for the PPF’s test could result in a submission being declined costing some companies millions more in levy.
 
 The issue is rooted in the selection of so called “Type A” guarantees, whereby a company guarantees payments into a pension scheme, by the trustees. Following new guidance issued by the PPF in December 2011, and recently clarified, trustees are now required to confirm that the value of the guarantor company is higher than the value of the guarantee it provides to the pension scheme. On top of that, the PPF will also conduct its own test on the guarantor. This ‘stressed and smoothed’ test looks at the value of the guarantee in extreme economic circumstances and the guarantor’s ability to pay it.
 
 “While the PPF’s guidance directs trustees to certify a guarantee based on recent information to assess the value of the guarantee,” said Mike Fenton, Mercer’s UK PPF Leader, “we know that the PPF will use the ‘stressed and smoothed’ approach to carry out its test. Given the economic volatility over recent years, it could well be that seemingly viable companies don’t meet the ‘stressed and smoothed’ test. The final decision rests on the results of the PPF’s test, and this will over ride the trustees’ certification, so the PPF might decline the guarantor, costing some companies millions in levy payments.”
 
 “The deadline for this year’s submission will have passed by the time a scheme hears that their submission has been rejected by the PPF so the matter is very important,” said Mike Fenton. “We are advising that those schemes guaranteed by a company which can not cover the “stressed and smoothed” test consider putting a cap in place, covering the deficit up to a certain amount. The alternative might be that the whole submission is thrown out.”
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.