Pensions - Articles - Phasing out NI raises huge questions for pensions


Aegon has set out just how far-reaching the Government’s long-term ambition to remove National Insurance from the UK tax system could be for pensions, with major intergenerational fairness risks.

 Director of Pensions at Aegon Steven Cameron said: “The consequences of abolishing National Insurance could dramatically change the pension landscape – for state, private and workplace pensions. While this clearly won’t and can’t happen overnight, the potential consequences need to be thought through in all their detail.

 “While such a radical change may be seen as a simplification, the devil will be in the detail with many questions to answer. One key unknown is whether the ambition relates to employer NI as well as employee and self-employed NI contributions. And what would the consequences be for income tax rates?”

 Aegon poses four big pensions considerations of eliminating NI

 Steven Cameron comments:

 • NI from today’s workers presented as paying today’s state pensions via NI fund – where will the funding come from?

 “The Government still reports on the ‘NI fund’, showing NI contributions received against state pension and other payments made year on year. So even if NI contributions are set separately from increases in the state pension, we need longer term clarity from whoever is in power on where the money for state pensions will come from.”

 • If scrapping NI led to ‘levelling up’ of income tax, the approach to pensions tax relief and how pensions in payment are taxed could create intergeneration unfairness

 “If NI were phased out, it’s likely that income tax rates would have to rise. Individuals currently receive tax relief on their pension contributions at their highest marginal rate, and pay income tax on income from their pension. So a ‘levelled up’ income tax rate would grant more relief on contributions but tax income from pensions by more. From a pensions perspective this could be ‘fair’ for someone starting their pensions savings. But it could be deeply unfair for those who are approaching or in retirement who could end up paying a higher rate of tax on their pension income than they’d received in tax relief on contributions. While those of working age may benefit from the scrapping of NI, those above state pension age wouldn’t as they’re already exempt from paying NI.”

 • NI contribution records currently determine eligibility for state pension with 35 years needed to qualify for full state pension

 “Currently entitlement to a state pension is based on years of NI contributions or credits such as when caring for children. Scrapping NI would require a new qualifying test - perhaps based on the number of years of paying income tax with credits for carers.”

 • Pensions ‘salary sacrifice’ arrangements would need rethought

 “Under salary sacrifice, the employee agrees with their employer to reduce their pay in exchange for a higher employer pension contribution, saving both income tax and also both employer and employee NI. The attractiveness of this will diminish if employee and potentially employer NI were scrapped.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.