Pensions - Articles - PPF confirms GMP treatment method & announces pilot project


 -Following lengthy consultation, PPF confirms GMP calculation method
 -Announces six month pilot project to test methodology
 -Applies to PPF schemes in assessment and to PPF members
 -FAS will request data so it can adjust FAS assistance
 -Approach most appropriate for PPF needs and meeting legal obligations

 The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) today (Thursday) confirmed how it will calculate compensation for men and women being assessed for entry into the PPF - or who are already PPF members - to ensure the equal treatment of men and women required by law.

 But, before applying the method to all pension schemes in the PPF assessment period, it will undertake a six month pilot project with selected schemes to iron out any teething problems.

 As the manager of the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS), the PPF will also ask affected FAS schemes in wind-up for data to enable it to adjust the calculation of assistance payments. To help schemes do this, the PPF will issue revised guidance shortly.

 PPF Executive Director for Financial Risk, Martin Clarke, said: "We have deliberated long and hard on this complex issue, consulting with stakeholders, seeking expert advice and undertaking in-depth actuarial work. We can now confirm a method which we believe to be the most satisfactory approach for our needs and for meeting our legal obligations.

 "But, to make sure the method works as well as it can, we will undertake a six month pilot with selected schemes. This enables us to put this calculation method through its paces so that it is fit-for-purpose when we roll it out to cover all PPF schemes in assessment.

 "I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those in the industry who have provided us with invaluable help while developing this calculation method."

 Alongside this announcement, the PPF published its response to the consultation on the calculation methodology which began in January.

 Differences in compensation or assistance payments for men and women can arise because of differences in the calculation of guaranteed minimum pensions (GMPs) - primarily brought about by different retirement ages. In 2008, the PPF confirmed that it has to take account of GMPs to ensure the equal treatment of men and women that is required by law.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

4 ways completing a tax return can help boost your pension
Missing the Self-Assessment deadline not only risks a penalty for late filing but could cost individuals hundreds, if not thousands of pounds in uncla
DWP holds AE thresholds with GBP90bn of pensions expected
The DWP has issued its review of the Automatic Enrolment Earnings Trigger and Qualifying Earnings Band for 2025/26, retaining all three thresholds at
Response to Triple Lock means testing comments
Aegon has called for ‘a future focused debate on a sustainable state pension’ following comments on the Triple Lock by Conservative leader Kemi Badeno

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.