Pensions - Articles - PwC & Redington Research: Diverging approaches to derisking


UK Defined Benefit pension schemes are diverging in their approach to managing interest rate and inflation risk, new research from PwC and Redington suggests.

 In a survey of pension schemes representing over £120bn worth of assets, PwC and Redington found a consensus amongst schemes that interest rate and inflation risk were now the two biggest issues impacting their de-risking journeys, with equity and market risk relegated to third place. However, further analysis carried out by the two firms found a clear divergence in how schemes are practically managing these risks, with reported interest rate and inflation protection ranging from 20 per cent to 100 per cent.

 Commenting on the findings, Paul Kitson, partner and head of risk transaction at PwC, said: “Our data suggests that schemes have split into two camps – those that have low levels of interest rate protection and are still at an early place in their risk management journey, and those that have bitten the bullet in recent years and have been quietly increasing their hedging of interest rate and inflation risk to 70 per cent plus.

 “It appears that many schemes have overcome the ‘regret risk’ of hedging interest rates and inflation in what some may argue could be the bottom of the market. These schemes are now increasingly shielded from further changes in interest rates and inflation expectations, be it positive or negative. However, many UK pension schemes still remain significantly exposed to interest rate and inflation changes, which means for these schemes there is the potential for deficits to reduce if interest rates rise faster than expected, but also the potential for deficits to increase still further if interest rates fall, or increase slower than expected.”

 The survey also assessed attitudes towards risk transactions, finding that more than three-quarters of schemes planning a buy-in or buy-out transaction are considering medical underwriting – an assessment of member health - as part of the process.
 However, less than 5 per cent of schemes are what could be described as “trade ready”, which PwC argues could lead to unexpected delays and costs when schemes are ready to transact.

 Paul Kitson said: “Despite some form of transaction being on the cards sooner or later for most schemes, it is surprising how few are actually “trade ready”. For many, the decision to proceed with a transaction will be based on pricing and we encourage schemes to pre-empt activity by ensuring the data and in particular documentation are in place.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

DB scheme trustees face agenda overload
Pensions dashboard readiness ranked as the leading challenge facing DB scheme trustees over the next 12 months, cited by 38% of trustees in new resear
DC Pension Tracker for Q2 2026
The Aon UK DC Pension Tracker rose over the first quarter of 2026, with all savers expected to see an increase in their expected future living standar
No single automatic enrolment reform protects low earners
The Pensions Policy Institute (PPI), the UK's leading independent authority on pensions and retirement policy, has published a new report today f

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.