Pensions - Articles - "Quick Fix" on Tata Steel risks undermining pension security


A 'quick fix' on the British Steel pension scheme to help save jobs at Tata Steel UK could risk undermining the pension security of millions of people, according to Steve Webb, Director of Policy at Royal London.

 As the deadline for bids for Tata Steel UK approaches, it is reported that potential bidders are unwilling to take on the liabilities of the company's pension scheme.

 Business Secretary Sajid Javid is believed to be looking at options which could allow the business to continue under new ownership with the pension fund deficit being reduced in part by scaling back the rights of existing pension scheme members. Measures to reduce members' rights could include using the generally lower Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rather than the Retail Prices Index (RPI) to calculate the level of inflation protection.

 The risk of such an approach is that it may set a precedent where other employers who could do more to fill gaps in their pension scheme choose instead to avoid some of their pension liabilities.

 The latest official figures produced in May 2016 by the Pension Protection Fund showed that four in five Defined Benefit pension schemes are currently in deficit (4,804 schemes out of 5,945) and that the collective deficit of all DB schemes stands at a massive £270 billion. If a deal at Tata allowed other employers to scale back their deficit by taking away pension rights that had already been built up, the pension rights of millions of workers and pensioners could be at risk.

 Commenting, Steve Webb, Director of Policy at Royal London said: "The desire to save steel jobs is entirely understandable, but there are huge risks if a 'quick fix' for this problem were to undermine the carefully constructed pension protection framework. The pensions of millions of workers and pensioners depend on employers honouring the pension promises that they have made. A deal on Tata must not create a precedent or a loophole which could be exploited by firms keen to walk away from their pension liabilities. Ministers must tread with extreme caution in this area.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR extends its oversight to professional trustee firms
A framework for oversight of professional trustees (PTs) will be introduced by The Pensions Regulator (TPR) to protect savers. The PT market has exper
Facilitating DC pension fund investment into private capital
Leaders from the pensions and private capital industries have issued new recommendations on how to facilitate UK DC pensions to invest in private capi
Government plan to allow extraction of cash from pensions
Members of defined benefit (DB) pension schemes fear that Government plans to allow employers to “extract” cash from their schemes put their retiremen

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.