Pensions - Articles - Reaction to House of Lords report on LDI


PensionBee and LCP comment on The House of Lords Industry and Regulators Committee criticising the use of ‘LDI’ strategies to fund defined benefit, private sector pension schemes, in a letter to Andrew Griffith MP, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, and Laura Trott MP, Minister for Pensions.

 Becky O’Connor, Director of Public Affairs of PensionBee, commented: “It’s important that the general public doesn’t lose faith in pensions in general as a result of the findings of risks and dangers by the Committee.

 “So-called ‘LDI’ strategies were applied specifically to ‘defined benefit’ private sector pension schemes, which are designed to pay out a certain amount of income in retirement related to someone’s salary. They do not apply to defined contribution schemes, which most of the millions of people employed by the private sector and auto-enrolled are in and which rely on stock market performance to generate a pot big enough to provide income when someone stops work.

 “Despite being a fairly niche strategy unique to one part of the pensions industry, the ramifications for the whole economy of these strategies going wrong were shown to be huge in the wake of the ill-fated mini-Budget last year.

 “The Committee’s recommendations are important for the economy as a whole, but also for trust in pensions as a sound place to build long term wealth, to be maintained.”

 Jonathan Camfield, partner at consultants LCP, who gave evidence to the Commons Work and Pensions Committee inquiry into LDI, said: "There is a strong case for further improvements to the regulation of pension scheme investment strategies, following the turmoil of last autumn. Individual pension schemes may well have made decisions that made sense in isolation but these had knock-on impacts for the financial system as a whole, and this is an area where closer regulatory oversight would have led to a less bumpy ride.

 However, the Bank of England already has a role to look at system-wide issues such as this, and, working in partnership with the Pensions Regulator could be tasked with making sure that the system as a whole is less vulnerable to shocks going forward. I am however sceptical that the underlying cause of these problems was the accounting rules which apply to pension schemes. Pensions schemes decide their investment strategy primarily on the basis of the law and regulations which come from the Government and the Pensions Regulator, and it was this framework which was the primary driver for the use of leveraged LDI in the first place".
  

 House of Lords Report - Leveraged LDI strategies worsened September 2022 financial turmoil

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

DB transfer compensation estimated to drop further for Q4 26
Broadstone finds a reduction to redress levels due to rising bond yields. A gain expected in most cases meaning that no redress is payable as the cons
Lump sums taken early and spent – Budget fears make it worse
76% of people aged 55-64 say they have already taken the lump sum from their pension, according to AJ Bell research. 23% of people who aren’t doing an
Third-party cyber risk tops concerns for DB pension trustees
Seven in ten (70%) DB Pension trustees say third-party or administrator vulnerability is among the biggest cyber risks facing schemes. 60% have board-

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.