General Insurance Article - Response to ABI statement on Ethnic Penalty in Car Insurance


Trevor Phillips response to ABI statement on the Webber Phillips report on an Ethnic Penalty in Car Insurance: “They appear not to have read the report or to understand what we are saying.

 A parallel would be the under-representation of black students in University, which has been acknowledged as a problem by both this PM and her predecessor. Nobody is saying it occurs because lecturers are bigots, but an inequality of outcome does exist and universities are trying to find out why.
 
 In this case, the insurers appear to be refusing to entertain the possibility that there is a problem – in effect, an ethnic penalty - and don’t want to look into it because they may not like what they find. The solution to this is simple: they should be transparent and publish their data.”
  
  
 The original report that the ABI commented on can be seen below
  
 New research finds strong link between high car insurance premiums and ethnicity
 Any motorist living in areas with a high proportion of ethnic minority households is being charged higher prices for their car insurance regardless of any other factor, according to a new study.
  
 The research, which used data provided by the AA for all 125 postcodes areas in the UK, found that people who live in multi-ethnic districts pay an ‘ethnic penalty’ in higher-than-average motor premiums of up to £458.
  
 In a report outlining their findings, data analysts Webber Phillips says there is a ‘strong statistical relationship’ – accounting for 60% of the variation - between ethnic minority prevalence and higher insurance premiums in a postcode.
  
 The study found that the additional cost affects an estimated 12 million people – more than one in five UK residents - regardless of the driver’s own ethnic origin.
  
 Webber Phillips concluded that the variations cannot be accounted for by prevalence of crime, or fear of crime, available claims data or relative affluence.
  
 “What we can say with confidence,” says the report, “is that the process of premium setting has definitely produced an inequality of outcome to the detriment of black and ethnic minority groups.”
  
 Tom Jones, head of policy at Thompsons Solicitors, which commissioned the research, said: “We decided to look into this issue because of the huge variations in premiums across the country and concerns raised with us that there might be a link with ethnicity.
  
 “This report confirms our fears that the process by which car insurers calculate premiums produces a wholly skewed result. It is outrageous that insurers should allow an outcome that is to the detriment not only of people from ethnic minority backgrounds but anyone else who lives in those areas.
  
 “Motor insurance profits are huge and now we now have evidence that they are making those bloated profits through bias and stereotyping. There are plenty of other reasons for it but this makes the point once and for all that we need greater transparency and accountability in what is a captive market for a product that is compulsory for everyone who wants to drive a vehicle in the UK.”
  
 Trevor Phillips, one of the authors of the report and the founding chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said: “The insurers have serious questions to answer about the way they calculate premiums. It is clear from our research that the ethnic penalty exists in all regions and in areas of affluence as well as poorer areas.
  
 “Publicly available government data demonstrates that high levels of vehicle crime are unlikely to be linked to ethnicity; and our analysis shows that the ethnic penalty persists even in areas populated by prosperous minorities.
  
 “In certain subsets, the correspondence between high premium levels and postcode areas with a high ethnic minority prevalence rises to 90% - meaning that higher premiums in these areas is almost entirely accounted for by ethnicity.
  
 “We examined the effect of other factors, such as fear of crime and available claims data, but we did not find that these factors carried any significant weight in our model – that is why we had no hesitation in concluding that an ethnic penalty exists.
  
 “Insurance companies urgently need to examine their procedures either to demonstrate this is not the case, which we think is unlikely, or to ensure new processes are put in place that eliminate discrimination.”
  
 To download the full report please click here

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Sleighing the risks by giving Santa the insurance he needs
While you might be the most magical employer in the world, we know that even you aren’t immune to the risks of running a global delivery service! From
Diversity improving in insurance and long term savings
Key figures from the Association of British Insurers’ latest Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) data collection highlight the work of insurers and
Almost a third of homeowners have been victims of burglaries
Research commissioned by Co-op Insurance reveals that almost one in three (29%) homeowners have been the victims of theft from their home. The member-

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.