Investment - Articles - SIPPs in danger of being used unnecessarily


 One in four people who invest in a SIPP have the vast majority (90% or more) of their assets held in either a Unit Trust or OEIC, according to research from Skandia's latest Adviser Confidence Barometer.*

 This highlights the concern that SIPPs may be being used unnecessarily, and a platform pension may be a suitable alternative, helping people meet their retirement needs in a more cost effective way.

 The survey also revealed that 70% of investors who have a SIPP do not use it to invest in ETFs, 60% do not use it to invest in investment trusts, and nearly half (45%) do not use it to invest in direct equities.

 The charging structure of a SIPP is generally more expensive than a platform pension - for limited additional benefit. If wider investment choice is not utilised, then it is not necessarily in the best interests of the customer to use the more expensive product wrapper. If the vast majority of a customer's SIPP investments are held in Unit Trust or OEIC then this raises the question as to whether a personal pension on a platform would have been a better, more cost effective, alternative.

 This is supported by further research from Skandia which shows that nearly half (46%) of advisers believe that just one in ten or less of their customers would be better off with a SIPP rather than a personal pension. This would indicate that SIPPs remain a niche investment vehicle and are better suited to individuals with bespoke investment needs.

 Nick Dixon, marketing director at Skandia comments:

 "Since the introduction of SIPPs their popularity has grown significantly and are sometimes positioned as the only pension worth having. This is not in the best interests of the majority of people and there is a danger that many SIPP customers are in the wrong product. Whilst a SIPP can offer a wide investment choice and flexibility, our research suggests that many investors aren't fully utilising the investment flexibility that SIPPs offer and would instead be better off with a platform pension.

 "As platform pensions continue to evolve - with the range of assets available and income flexibility increasing - we would expect platform pensions to increasingly replace the need for SIPPs."

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Schroders receive FM mandate from RNIB Retirements Scheme
Schroders Solutions today announces it has been awarded a £170 million Fiduciary Management (FM) mandate by the Royal National Institute of Blind Peop
Comments on the unexpected fall in inflation
Standard Life and My Pension expert comment as inflation unexpectedly falls to 2.5%
PIC complete full buyin for Holophane Retirement Scheme
Pension Insurance Corporation plc (“PIC”), a specialist insurer of defined benefit pension schemes, has concluded a £24 million full buy-in of the Hol

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.