Pensions - Articles - Snapshot of pension projection weird and confusing


Hymans Robertson warns that DC pension income predictions are likely to shock members this year as they could be between 8%-20% lower than they saw last year. As members receive their SMPIs for 2017/18, schemes have a duty to provide context, reassurance and guidance through their communications. Otherwise there is a risk that members will have knee-jerk reactions and be put off saving.

 Statutory Money Purchase Illustrations (SMPIs) have been required by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and issued annually to members since 2003. They illustrate the pension a DC member can expect to retire with based on inflation linked annuities.This year the income predictions are due to be significantly lower than when SMPIs were first introduced, primarily caused by the increasing cost of guaranteeing a pension via an annuity

 The potential fall in projected benefits by between 8%-20% this year compounds a far greater change since 2003. Hymans Robertson’s calculations show that a 25 year old earning £25,000 p/a in 2003 and contributing 4% of their salary (rising to 10% by retirement), with this contribution matched by their employer, would have expected to receive a pension of 70%-80% of their salary upon retirement. Bringing the same example forward to today would only see them expecting to receive 20%-25% of their salary at retirement. This is a reduction by more than half and highlights the need to provide additional support and context for members, if they are to make informed decisions.

 Paul Waters, Partner and Head of Guided Outcomes, Hymans Robertson, comments,“It has long been our view that SMPI projections represent little more than a snapshot in time and fail to accurately communicate the context for members to make the best financial decisions for their needs. They are rarely read and often misunderstood.

 “With the number of DC schemes growing and representing an increasing proportion of savers it is crucial we accurately and sensitively convey how funds grow over time and how they can be used to finance retirement. Members have a range of options at retirement and SMPI statements do not reflect this.

 “Younger members need help understanding the level of income they will need in retirement and are they on track. Older members need help in understanding the new flexibilities that are available to them. SMPI statements do neither. A different approach is needed, backed up by technology that can deliver the level of personalisation and simple messaging required. We do this through Guided Outcomes™”

 Nick Throp, Founder of likeminds, employee communications agency comments: “As pension decisions become more complex and increasingly unique to an individual’s specifc circumstances, clear communication is essential. Pension scheme trustees have a duty to communicate this information carefully to provide a full explanation of what these numbers mean to members over the long term.To rely purely on the numbers risks disengaging members from their savings habits when it is widely accepted that the vast majority are already not saving enough.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.