Pensions - Articles - State pension under scrutiny in benefit uprating debate


There was a benefits uprating debate in the House of Commons. Alison McGovern MP described the current approach to uprating as “farcical” that causes speculation and stress and called for a more standard approach. Nigel Mills MP questioned why the September inflation figure is used for an April benefits uprating. He asked whether using later figures would prevent spikes. He proposed whether using a two- or three-year rolling average could smooth things out.

 The Pensions Minister was questioned over efforts to boost Pension Credit take up as well as the progress of the Auto-enrolment Extension Bill. He said Pension Credit inquiries had grown and that he was pushing hard for progress on the AE Extension Bill.

 Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis, Hargreaves Lansdown: “The triple lock has had a rollercoaster ride, delivering two of its highest increases ever in the past two years, after being controversially suspended during the pandemic. After a period of time when people’s finances have been torn to shreds by the cost-of-living crisis, the MPs were in no mood to oppose the 8.5% increase due to come into effect in April, but there was a sense that change is needed in how benefits are uprated.

 Nigel Mills MP questioned whether the September inflation figure needed to be used for an April uprating, or whether the process could be simplified so that a later figure could be used that would provide a more realistic picture in periods when inflation or wages are moving quickly. He pointed out that using a two- or three-year rolling average might prove more useful in delivering a smoothed figure. Such measures would surely go some way towards containing costs.

 Others pointed to the need for a more standardised approach to bring pensioners much needed certainty around what they get and when. Pensioner poverty was a key part of the debate with the recent Joseph Rowntree Poverty report showing over 2m pensioners are in poverty. Wendy Chamberlain MP added that given so many pensioners continue to go hungry, perhaps the discussion needs to move to how much the state pension needs to be, rather than how much to uprate it by.

 We’ve reached an important point in this debate. The triple lock has boosted state pensions, but the fact remains many pensioners remain in poverty while state pension costs spiral. A review of state pensions, and the triple lock’s role within it, is urgently needed to deliver a system that delivers certainty for pensioners now and in the future.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Master trusts continue to reshape DC pensions market
Master trusts now account for 41% of large DC schemes in the research, up from less than 30% in 2022. Large master trusts are serving more than 60% of
The £56k Inheritance Assumption Gap
Fewer than half (46%) have discussed inheritance plans with their loved ones. Average anticipated inheritance is £56,535 potentially leaving a big hol
State of the Nation paper for DB pension schemes
Three years on from the Mansion House reforms and with the Pension Schemes Act now receiving Royal Assent, policy ambition for DB pension schemes has

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.