Pensions - Articles - Survey reveals low confidence in Solvency II implementation


Barnett Waddingham survey reveals low confidence in Solvency II implementation date

 Over three quarters of insurance companies believe that the Solvency II implementation date will be delayed beyond its intended start date of 1 January 2014, according to research conducted by Barnett Waddingham, UK’s leading independent firm of actuaries, pension administrators and consultants.

 The survey, which was designed to find out how prepared firms are in all the main areas of Solvency II, showed that of the 39 Insurance companies surveyed only 24% of respondents are confident that Solvency II will be implemented on 1 January 2014.

 The survey revealed:

 Insurance companies are getting on top of Pillar 1 - the design, creation and testing stages of the internal model approval process are progressing well but validation and documentation need further work
 55% of respondents said they are behind schedule with their Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) but 87% of respondents said that their attention will now be on implementing their ORSA
 The practical implementation aspects of the ORSA were identified as being the most challenging: 71% indicated that they have had problems translating the technical requirements of the ORSA into a practical plan
 68% of respondents indicated that they will now be devoting more time to meeting reporting requirements
 45% of respondents do not have the required data readily available and only 26% have started considering the narrative content
 53% of insurance companies who responded have not yet considered the impact of Solvency II on the management of its defined benefit pension scheme
 The uncertainty surrounding Solvency II has impacted the availability of resources for 97% of insurance companies that completed the survey and 60% responded that it has had a negative impact on their Solvency II project

 Kim Durniat, Associate, Barnett Waddingham said:

 “Whilst we can see that firms are progressing with the quantitative aspects of Solvency II, it is essential that firms consider more closely what Solvency II means for their business.

 “Insurance companies need to review their approach to capital management by looking at their investment strategy, reinsurance arrangements and business mix. It is also concerning the amount of firms that have not yet considered the impact that Solvency II may have on their pension scheme. All departments of insurance companies should be focused on implementation of Solvency II and not just the Solvency II project teams.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.