Pensions - Articles - TEE approach is flawed, says Jelf


Jelf Employee Benefits gives their response to the Consultation ‘Strengthening the Incentive to Save: A Consultation on Pensions tax relief’ which proposes to switch from the current pensions tax system, where contributions and investment income are exempt from tax and only the benefits are taxed (EET), to a new system where contributions are taxable but investment income and benefits are exempt (TEE):

 Nick Allen is head of pensions consultancy for Jelf Employee Benefits
 ‘We believe that tax relief is an incentive to save, however because it’s been shrouded in complexity, it isn’t well understood and so the incentive isn’t maximised. However, once explained, people see it as a compelling incentive to save. Coupled with the fact that employers now (or soon will) also make pension contributions because of auto enrolment, the combination makes investing into pensions an attractive option. The key is to communicate the value. Explaining the value requires education, and it makes sense for employers to invest in such education, not least to maximise the value of their spend on pension benefits.
  
 ‘We believe the TEE approach, whilst plausible, is flawed. There is quite a lot of tax law that would need to change in order to accommodate it, as well as measures to remove tax avoidance that could otherwise occur. This would serve to make TEE more complicated and costly to business, which is unwelcome. Moreover, the long-term implications of TEE are not fully understood and so could be risky play by any government given the long-term effect it might have.
  
 ‘We propose further simplification in the annual allowance to be set at a level that would allow the majority of UK employees to save sufficient funds for retirement purposes but removes the tilt towards the highest paid people benefiting from the majority of the tax relief in the system. We also believe that even further simplification on funding contributions should be introduced by removing carry forward so that it is on a use-it or lose-it basis.
 
 ‘More radically, subject to caps and collars, we propose pension freedoms are extended to those aged below 55. This would open up the opportunity for a true workplace-saving culture that would appeal to all age groups and support their work and life. We believe there are existing systems in place to open up these wider freedoms to a broader age range such that minimums remain in the pension saving environment whilst allowing access for typical lifecycle needs. Combined with workplace financial education, this type of savings environment could revolutionise personal wealth creation and help people become more prosperous over the long term.’
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.