Pensions - Articles - TPR says trustees should check on use of alternative funds


Trustees of defined contribution (DC) schemes redirecting contributions made during COVID-19 to alternative funds should check they’re not unintentionally breaching pension legislation.

 DC schemes may have members who have self-selected investment in funds, such as property, that have been temporarily closed – or ‘gated’ – until the market normalises following COVID-19-fuelled market volatility. Contributions that come in during this period cannot be invested in these funds and so trustees will need to invest them in an alternative fund.

 The Pensions Regulator (TPR) warned  this may see these alternative funds become default arrangements for the purposes of legislation.

 This would mean they would be subject to rules such as a charge cap (if the scheme is used for automatic enrolment) and the need for a separate Statement for Investment Principles for this default arrangement.

 TPR’s view is the only ways a default arrangement would not be created are if:
 • members were made aware funds could be diverted before they selected the original fund; or
 • trustees subsequently obtained consent from members before diverting contributions.

 Trustees should review the DC code of practice, which explains where a fund will be a default arrangement. They may need legal advice to check if their scheme is affected.

 If they’ve unintentionally created a default arrangement should take immediate steps to ensure they meet legal requirements.

 TPR has reassured trustees it will continue take a pragmatic approach, based on individual scheme circumstance, in deciding whether to take enforcement action.

 However, it has warned it has no discretion in using its powers regarding chair’s statements and will continue to impose fines for non-compliance.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.