Pensions - Articles - Transfers bounce back to almost hit 2019 record highs


Defined benefit (DB) transfer values increased by nearly 4% during May; and the number of members taking a transfer value rose slightly from the record low observed in April, according to XPS Transfer Watch. XPS Transfer Watch monitors how market developments have affected transfer values for an example member, as well as how many members are choosing to take a transfer.

 XPS Pensions Group’s Transfer Value Index increased steadily throughout May, finishing the month at £258,600, up from £249,300 at the end of April. This increase was a result of a rise in long-term inflation expectations during the month. The index is now only marginally lower than the record value of £260,422 observed on 3 September 2019.

 XPS Pensions Group’s Transfer Activity Index rebounded from the record low of 0.58% set in April, with the number of completed transfers increasing to an annual equivalent of 0.65% of eligible members. This represents just over 6 in every 1,000 eligible members transferring each year.

 In market news, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has confirmed that it will ban contingent charging for pensions transfer advice from 1 October 2020, in all but a small number of circumstances. The ban has been designed to address the FCA’s long-standing concerns about conflicts of interest arising from advice fees that are dependent on transfers proceeding.

  

 

 Mark Barlow, Partner, XPS Pensions Group commented: “Transfer values rose during May as we saw long-term inflation expectations return to pre-lockdown levels. We also saw a small uptick in transfer activity during May which may be a result of those schemes who initially paused transfers restarting quotations. At XPS, around 25% of schemes we work with paused transfers initially but our most recent survey in mid-May showed only 6% continue to suspend quotations.

 “The ban on contingent charging has been expected for some time. We are generally supportive of this change, as it will remove a potential conflict of interests from advisors. However, it could lead to worse outcomes in the short-term as members find it difficult to take advice, either because they are unwilling to pay upfront advice fees or due to a shortage of capacity as firms withdraw from the market.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.