General Insurance Article - Travel insurers reputation takes another knock


The disruption of Ryanair flights was set to be the biggest shock the airline industry would experience in 2017. However the announcement that Monarch Airlines is to cease trading has superseded this, with over 750,000 bookings being cancelled. Monarch’s demise is believed to be related to the dip in travel following terrorist attacks on tourists in Egypt and Tunisia, as well as political unrest in Turkey, according to GlobalData a leading data and analytics company.

 Daniel Pearce a Financial Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “The loss of travelers to these destinations forced Monarch to compete with low-cost airlines on routes to European countries – something the airline struggled to do effectively. The volatility in the value of the British pound has not helped matters.”

 It is believed that close to 50% of Monarch’s customers will be protected by ATOL, allowing them to receive a full refund for the cost of their holiday. However, this means around half are unprotected, which is compounded by the fact that travel insurance often falls short of covering airlines going out of business.

 This means the remaining Monarch travelers will have to pursue refunds through credit cards under Section 75 or, if they used a debit card, via the chargeback system. But many will struggle to claim refunds for other associated costs, such as car hire or accommodation which will surely lead to questions being asked of travel insurers.

 The travel insurance industry has perennially suffered from a lack of customer awareness around policy terms, and is currently facing issues surrounding customer satisfaction.

 Pearce continues: “The fallout from Ryanair’s and Monarch’s woes will not help the industry improve its reputation, even though insurers may argue that their policies clearly state which events are covered.”

 Travel insurance providers could seek to appease consumers by introducing new policies that not only cover airline collapse and flight cancellations, but that also protects related holiday expenses such as accommodation.

 Pearce adds: “At the same time, insurers should explore methods to more effectively communicate and engage with consumers. If customers are fully informed about what is covered within their policy, then the travel insurance industry is less likely to suffer reputational damage when things go wrong.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

IPT receipts for 2024 to 2025 hits over GB7bn in January
According to this morning’s HMRC data, Insurance Premium Tax (“IPT”) receipts stood at £853 million in January 2025, bringing the 10-month total for t
Unlocking the potential of IFRS17 insights and opportunities
As mentioned in part one of this blog series, IFRS 17 has reshaped financial reporting for insurance contracts since its implementation on 1 January 2
Lack of expertise main barrier to AI adoption in insurance
A lack of expertise within insurance companies is the biggest challenge to implementing artificial intelligence (AI) technology. As AI has the potenti

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.