Pensions - Articles - Two trustee accreditation regimes unhelpful to the industry


Comment below from Tom Lukic, Director at Dalriada Trustees on the two different accreditation regimes launched by the APPT and PMI.

 Tom Lukic, Director at Dalriada Trustees, said: “There are now two incredibly similar accreditation regimes which is unhelpful to the industry, could potentially cause confusion and undermine the benefits an accreditation programme was meant to bring to pension scheme governance. However, with a choice of accreditation regimes now available, professional trustees are having to carefully consider which they want to follow.

 Whilst our strong preference was for a single accreditation process, we now have to decide between the two. What’s best, an accreditation regime run by professional trustees for professional trustees, learning and developing from direct experience or one run by a third-party commercial organisation? Whilst as a firm we remain supportive of the PMI, with regards to accreditation our intention is to continue to support the APPT’s accreditation process going forwards. We will be putting all of our professional trustees through the APPT’s process.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Comments on the PPF levy announcement
WTW and Broadstone comment on the PPF levy announcement
Schroders pension to harness DB surplus for DC contributions
Schroders announces its commitment to running-on its Defined Benefit (DB) pension and leveraging a portion of the surplus to partially fund its Define
Proposed PPF Levy change welcomed
The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has repeatedly called for a legislative change that would enable the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) to reduc

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.