Pensions - Articles - Unlocking regulatory impasse may give explosion of diversity


An end to the regulatory ‘stalemate’ around pension consolidators triggered by the Coronavirus crisis could be followed by an ‘explosion of diversity’ in the strategies being adopted by company pension funds according to LCP partner Steve Webb.

 The idea of company pension schemes dealing with their liabilities through a ‘consolidator’ has been discussed within and beyond government for several years. The main stumbling block has come from the Treasury and the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) who are concerned that consolidators might act as unfair competition for the insurance industry and the buy-out market. Until recently the whole concept has been in limbo as potential market players wait for government to make up its mind.
 
 However, according to Steve Webb, the current crisis could act as a trigger to unlock the necessary legal framework. Growing numbers of schemes may have sponsoring employers who are weaker than before and in some cases may face insolvencies at a time when funding levels are above PPF levels but short of the amount needed to insure pensions in full. This is likely to trigger growing interest in consolidator models. Government is likely to come under pressure to resolve this issue, especially where options are available which could produce better outcomes for members than traditional routes.
 
 Consolidator-type options could include:
 • Consolidators as a route to buyout;
 • Consolidators which take over the pension scheme to run it on;
 • Other bespoke ‘innovative’ solutions involving capital providers offering to boost the funding of the scheme in return for a potential ‘upside’ return from keeping the scheme going;
 
 Whilst a new Act of Parliament to legislate for consolidators is still likely to be years away, the Pensions Regulator has previously indicated that it would be willing to issue an ‘interim’ regulatory framework to enable the market to get started, pending a final framework from central government. Central government is now expected to devote more attention to resolve this matter in a way which would allow the market – and its many variants – to develop.
 
 Commenting, Steve Webb, partner at LCP said: “Historically, pension schemes have been heading either for a buyout or have planned to run on to meet liabilities as they fall due. But in recent years a range of new funding models have come forward, many of which involve new ways of getting external capital involved. Until now everything has been in limbo while battle has raged in central government over whether these approaches should be allowed. But the time has now come for government to make a decision once-and-for-all. If the go ahead is given, we are likely to see an explosion in diversity of scheme strategies. Trustees will start to see a menu of options which they will want to tailor to their specific circumstances. The range of funding strategies in the DB world could look very different this time next year”.
 
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

2025 is a key year for pensions to consider their endgame
Aon has said that 2025 is a key year for UK pension schemes and has formed the UK Endgame Strategy team to help schemes with the decision-making proce
How pension tweak could save employers thousands
National Living Wage increased this month from £11.44 to £12.21 per hour. Employer National Insurance (NI) has also risen and the threshold at which e
2024 pension contributions surge but gender gap widens
New analysis from PensionBee highlights a sharp increase in pension contributions in 2024, despite ongoing pressures on household budgets.

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.