Pensions - Articles - Wary of advising on DB due to complexity of FCA regulations


New research from Aegon shows that 7 in 10 (69%) advisers who are or have been active in advising on defined benefits and potential transfers think the complexity of FCA regulations is impacting their likelihood of providing advice in this area.

 The FCA updated its expectations for advice in this area with new regulations introduced last year. However a strongly worded update on a targeted suitability review highlighted weaknesses it continued to find amongst some adviser firms, leaving many advisers with concerns that the regulations may not be completely clear and could be subject to different future interpretations.

 Advisers’ feedback is that they want to be more confident that the advice they provide is fully in line with the regulator’s expectations and won’t leave them open to any retrospective challenges. Misgivings about regulatory interpretations are having an impact on the defined benefit advice market, with three quarters (75%) of advisers saying it isn’t currently working as well as it could in meeting the needs of consumers.

 While for most people, remaining in their defined benefit scheme will be the best option, this isn’t the case for everyone and it is essential that those wishing to review their options have access to advice. Aegon is highlighting concerns that without a sufficient supply of advice to meet consumer demand, the advice market just isn’t effective – something that regulators, politicians and the industry shouldn’t find acceptable.

 Steven Cameron, Pensions Director at Aegon, commented: “Everyone accepts that advice on defined benefits is a highly complex area. Where consensus is harder to reach is exactly how the FCA’s updated regulations and suitability review comments should be interpreted.

 “Previous and ongoing reviews of suitability from the FCA shows defined benefit advice remains under intense regulatory scrutiny. FCA strongly worded feedback provides further detail on ongoing weaknesses with some firms’ advice. Advisers clearly want as much regulatory certainty as possible and while regulations and updates are helpful, the greater the volume, the more complex it can be to be confident in interpretation.

 “Aegon believes most people will be better off staying in their defined benefit scheme, but it is imperative that those wishing to review their options have access to advice. This means any further reduction in the supply of advice will be to the detriment of consumers. While advisers face other challenges, such as obtaining Professional Indemnity Insurance, we’re keen to address concerns over complexity of regulations. We hope our hub helps in this regard and provides advisers with more clarity when offering advice in this important area.”

 To support advisers interpret FCA regulations around offering advice in this area, Aegon’s DB hub has a range of materials to help advisers explore FCA requirements as they consider if a transfer is suitable for clients.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.